Second leaked execution video shows bloody wound on Saddam's neck



A new video of Saddam Hussein's body, showing a neck wound, was posted on the Internet early today, the second leak of clandestine pictures from Saddam's hanging.

The video appeared to have been taken with a camera phone, as was the video of the hanging that showed guards taunting Saddam in the final moments of his life.

The footage pans up Saddam's shrouded body from the feet. It apparently was taken soon after Saddam was executed and placed on a gurney. He was hanged Dec. 30.

As the panning shot reaches the head region, the white shroud is pulled back to show Saddam's head and neck.

His head is unnaturally twisted at a 90 degree angle to his right. The video also shows a bloody, circular wound about an inch below his jaw line on the left side of his neck. His left cheek is marked with red blotches, and there is blood on the shroud where it covered his head.

The newest video leak is likely to increase the angry reaction to the way that the execution was carried out. There has already been an outcry about the undignified manner in which the Shiite-dominated government hanged Saddam, a Sunni.

The 27-second video was posted on an Iraqi news Web site that is known to support Saddam's outlawed Baath Party.

"A new film of the late immortal martyr, President Saddam Hussein," the Web site said in a headline over a link to the video.

Voices could be heard on the video. As the shroud is pulled back, one voice says, "Hurry up, hurry up. I'm going to count from one to four. One, two.... Hurry up, you're going to get us into a catastrophe."

Then another voice, apparently the man taking the pictures, says, "Just one second, just one second, Abu Ali. I'm about finished."

Then a third voice says, "Abu Ali, you take care of this."

It was the second clandestine video to have been leaked, the first showing Saddam being taunted in his final moments. It showed Saddam dropping through the gallows floor as he prayed. It ends with his body swinging at the end of the rope.

The clandestine hanging video was in sharp contrast with an official video that was broadcast not long after Saddam's execution which showed him standing silently on the gallows as the noose was put around his neck. The official video was silent.

On the leaked hanging video, however, voices could be heard taunting him.

Sphere: Related Content

Japanese race queens confess to off-track shenanigans


Masuo Kamiyama

Young, long-haired, leggy and with dazzling smiles, Race Queens (abbreviated to RQs herein) are a familiar presence atop the winner's podium at the nation's racetracks. And not surprisingly, the chemical admixture of excitement, speed and danger on the track is a successful catalyst for erotic activity off the track.

The services of the RQs, Shukan Taishu informs readers, are procured either by the track operators or by the racing teams. If they're lucky, they are contracted to make appearances for an entire season.

Several gals who launched their careers in bathing suits at racetracks -- like Reiko Takashima and Naoko Iijima, and more recently Miho Yoshioka and Chisato Morishita -- have used their RQ popularity as a springboard to showbiz.

But all too often these days RQs are hired and paid on an ad hoc basis, which means they have to work extra hard at pleasing the clients who retain them. And Shukan Taishu was not the least bit surprised to discover that as part of their jobs, they are expected to do more than smile at the cameras. A lot more.

First, let's look at the experience of Yukie Shirakawa, age 22. (Her name, as are all the others in this article, has been changed to protect the not-so-innocent.)

"During the era of the bubble economy, RQs were often guaranteed as much as 100,000 yen a day for appearances. Now, in some cases it's down to one-tenth that amount," she tells Shukan Taishu. "It's become impossible for a gal to earn a living just by working as an RQ.

"You might be propositioned by a mechanic or engineer," she says. "But it's the drivers who really come on the strongest. They'll tell me, with a completely straight face, 'Danger is always at our side. Wanting sex is something that's instinctive for us.'"

Yukie claims to have declined these invitations, but as a penalty for not rolling over she is forced to work hard at several jobs to support herself, such as modeling.

"The shooting is done closer to where I live than the race track," she shrugs. "But the agency and studio all take their cut, so I only get about 10,000 yen a day."

Kyoko Satoyama, 24, is ready to confirm that what the drivers claim about getting it on after confronting danger on the track is indeed true. In fact, she insists there's nothing like having her, uh, accelerator floored by a passionate driver.

"Immediately after the race, their adrenalin levels are still high," she giggles. "They really get wild in bed."

Of course, not all the action is adjacent to the track or after a race.

"At the end of every race season, the staff, drivers and sponsors of the team I work for arrange a weekend stay at a rural hot spring," says Yuka Ando, 23. "But they've got anything on their minds except relaxation. They'll play raunchy drinking games like "baseball fist" and it's common for them to insist that I join them in the bath. If I refuse, they'll let the contract run out without renewing it.

"On the other hand," she continues, "if I spend a night in the sack with a sponsor or one of the team's bosses, renewal is almost a certainty. And I can tell you, very few gals in this business are in a position to say no."

As their bloom of youth begins to fade, and younger, cuter competition threatens to nudge them out of work, some RQs begin to search for a more stable relationship.

"They'll take jobs as models or 'companions' at motor shows and other events, hoping to meet well-paid account executives from ad agencies," says Yuka, who adds that they also pass out business cards that carry pinup photos of them in skimpy bathing suits, with their cell phone numbers printed beneath.

Should they make the acquaintance of a promising bachelor, they've been known to employ a variety of tried-and-true techniques by which to spring their trap. One familiar subterfuge is to surreptitiously prick a pinhole in a condom and then, several weeks later, present their partner with a "fait accompli" that will hopefully transform them from an eye-catching RQ to an expectant BB (blushing bride).

Behind the race queen's fetching smiles, Shukan Taishu warns, is a race for survival.

Sphere: Related Content

What was the Penthouse Pet (Lisa Ann Taylor) doing in her country club home?


It's called the world's oldest profession, but when the prostitution allegations involve a place called Sugarloaf and a woman named Lisa Ann Taylor, the old story gets a new twist. This morning's Atlanta Journal-Constitution explains.

Who is Taylor? "Taylor is better known by the stage name Melissa Wolf, a Penthouse Pet of the Month from 1985 and star of several X-rated films. Taylor's alleged business partner, Nicole Alaine Probert, 30, of Lawrenceville, uses the name Naughty Nikki and Brigit Foxxx according to her arrest warrant."

And what is Sugarloaf? "Sugarloaf, a gated community in Duluth, is home to some of Atlanta's wealthiest business executives, Braves and Falcons players, hip-hop artists and other celebrities. The Sugarloaf Country Club hosts the PGA's BellSouth Classic each May."

That's right, Atlanta-area police are accusing a former Penthouse Pet of turning a million-dollar country club home into The Most Exclusive Little Whorehouse in Georgia. The Journal-Constitution has the mugshots, and WSB has a video report.

In a Gwinnett Daily Post story, there's word the allegations stemmed from a website "where customers, who refer to themselves as 'hobbyists,' post comments about services rendered by call girls who operate in various cities nationwide." Editor and Publisher describes how someone seeing those comments tipped the Daily Post, which then forwarded the info to local authorities.

Sphere: Related Content

Bush prepares to announce new Iraq plan


HOPE YEN,

Associated Press Writer

President Bush is putting the finishing touches on a revised war strategy he plans to announce this week, possibly on Wednesday. In addition to a troop increase, the proposal could provide more money for jobs and reconstruction programs in Iraq.

Meanwhile, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is cautioning Bush to think twice before proposing a troop increase in Iraq, suggesting the new Democratic-controlled Congress could deny him the funding.

But the Senate's top Republican said he believed that Bush will get the money he needs and cast doubt that Democrats would — or could — block him. "Congress is incapable of micromanaging the tactics in the war," said Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky.

In issuing her warning, Pelosi made clear that her party supported boosting the overall military size "to protect the American people against any threats to our interests" and would not cut off money for troops already in Iraq.

But Bush will not get a blank check for an open-ended commitment there, she said. Any funding he seeks for additional forces in Iraq — Bush's expected plan could send as many as 20,000 more U.S. troops — will get the "harshest scrutiny."

"The burden is on the president to justify any additional resources for a mission," said Pelosi, D-Calif. "Congress is ready to use its constitutional authority of oversight to question what is the justification for this spending, what are the results we are receiving."

"There's not a carte blanche, a blank check for him to do whatever he wishes there," she added in an interview taped Saturday and broadcast Sunday.

Asked about Pelosi's remarks, White House spokesman Alex Conant said Bush welcomed any ideas on Iraq that "lead to success."

"We're glad the speaker wants us to succeed in Iraq," he said.

Since the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, Congress has approved about $500 billion for Iraq, Afghanistan and other terrorism-fighting efforts. The White House is working on its largest-ever appeal for more war funds — a record $100 billion, at least. It will be submitted along with Bush's Feb. 5 budget.

While leading Democrats reaffirmed their opposition to a troop buildup, several did not join Pelosi in suggesting it was possible Congress could deny Bush the money for the additional forces.

"I don't want to anticipate that," said House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md.

Sen. Joe Biden, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and a 2008 presidential candidate, said increasing troops would be a "tragic mistake." But he contended Congress was constitutionally powerless to second-guess Bush's military strategy because lawmakers had voted to authorize the commander in chief to wage war.

"As a practical matter, there's no way to say, 'Mr. President, stop,'" said Biden, D-Del., unless enough congressional Republicans join Democrats in persuading Bush that the strategy is wrong.

Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., told Bush in a letter last week that Democrats oppose additional U.S. forces in Iraq and want him to begin withdrawing in four months to six months American troops already there.

Sen. John McCain (news, bio, voting record), R-Ariz., wrote in Sunday's Washington Post that boosting troops for an indefinite time was necessary to secure peace in the Mideast.

"When we authorized this war, we accepted the responsibility to make sure they could prevail," he wrote. "Even greater than the costs incurred thus far and in the future are the catastrophic consequences that would ensure from our failure in Iraq."

Pelosi spoke on CBS' "Face the Nation," McConnell and Hoyer appeared on "Fox News Sunday," and Biden was on NBC's "Meet the Press."

Sphere: Related Content

Court drops charges against Saddam


SINAN SALAHEDDIN,
Associated Press Writer

Saddam Hussein's trial for the killing of 180,000 Kurds in the 1980s resumed Monday with the late dictator's seat empty, nine days after he went to the gallows. The court's first order of business was to drop all charges against Saddam.

Six co-defendants still face charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity for their roles in a military campaign code-named Operation Anfal during the 1980-88 Iraq-Iran war.

Shortly after the court reconvened Monday, a bailiff called out the names of the accused and the six men walked silently into the courtroom one after another.

Chief Judge Mohammed Oreibi al-Khalifa said the court decided to stop all legal action against the former president, since "the death of defendant Saddam was confirmed."

Saddam was sentenced to death for the killing of 148 Shiites and hanged on Dec. 30 in a chaotic execution that has drawn global criticism for the Shiite-dominated government.

All seven defendants in the Anfal case, including Saddam, had pleaded innocent to charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity. Saddam and one other man also pleaded innocent to the additional charge of genocide.

The six remaining defendants — all senior members of Saddam's ousted regime — include his cousin Ali Hassan al-Majid, known as "Chemical Ali" for his alleged use of chemical weapons against Iraqi Kurds.

The other defendants are former Defense Minister Sultan Hashim al-Tai, who was the commander of Task Force Anfal and head of the Iraqi army 1st Corps; Sabir al-Douri, Saddam's military intelligence chief; Taher Tawfiq al-Ani, former governor of Mosul and head of the Northern Affairs Committee; Hussein Rashid Mohammed, former deputy director of operations for the Iraqi Armed Forces and Farhan Mutlaq Saleh, former head of military intelligence's eastern regional office.

Sphere: Related Content

Saddam's execution and the role of Bush Government and the media


Amjad K Maruf

Al-Jazeerah,

Right from the invasion of Iraq, to Saddam’s capture, to his hanging – everything was pre-planned by George Bush. The non-existent WMDs were just a ruse to invade Iraq for OIL. Who would believe that Saddam Hussein – a brave man who went to the gallows without wearing a hood, embraced death without fear and with a smile – would surrender so meekly to US forces and hide in a hole as was shown by the US on the TV when he was captured?

Doubtlessly he would have fought bravely before being captured by US army. The footage shown later was clearly a film shot by the US authorities to show the world how coward Saddam Hussein was. But Saddam’s bravery during his execution clearly exposed the US. Then it was the time to install a puppet government and a sham democracy in Iraq. Though Saddam Hussein was touted to be guilty of killing his own men, he should have been given a fair trial before his execution.

The fair trial by the puppet Iraqi Government was nothing but a sham. Everyone knows who held the strings of the puppet government, who put the noose around Saddam’s neck and who pulled the lever. It was clear that Bush was so afraid of a living and captured Saddam that he wanted him to be executed as soon as possible. According to the law, Saddam could not be executed once he attains 70 years of age, which was to be in April this year.

So the sham trial was expedited to get rid of Saddam as soon as possible. And what a timing of the execution – on Eid’s eve. To incite the Muslim communities and widen the rift between Shias and Sunnis further. The Bush Government did not stop at that. The execution was allowed to get filmed on the cell phone and was distributed to the media for the world to see it live.

How could anyone use a cell phone in such a place without the knowledge of the security?

People are not fools as Bush would like to believe. Definitely, the US could not do it officially hence the cell phone drama.

Even if the footage was leaked to the Internet where was the need for the media to show it on television news channels?

Except for one news channel, all the news channels in India repeatedly showed the footage, 24X7?

Shouldn’t they have avoided showing the footage unless their intention was to increase their TRPs and hurt people’s sentiments?

This should not have happened in a civilized society. It will be anarchy now in Iraq with Shi'is and Sunnis killing each other. In no time there would be little Iraqis left and it is then that US would takeover Iraq and the oil reserves. And what is the World doing. Just watching the tamasha. Yeah, tamasha it was, all along.

Many people are criticizing the various political parties and the Muslim community who had voiced their protest against the execution. Yes, the execution was an internal matter of Iraq but these people should know that Saddam was a friend of India and had always supported India. This is the reason why everyone – right from Shivsena, BJP & other political parties to the common man irrespective of their religion - supported Saddam and felt angry on his execution.

Finally, now that Saddam has been punished for killing innocent people how about punishing Bush in the same manner. After all he is responsible for killing not only thousands of innocent Iraqi civilians but also his own people who are unnecessarily being forced to give up their lives so that Bush could plunder Iraq.

Opinions expressed in various sections are the sole responsibility of their authors and they may not represent Al-Jazeerah's.

Sphere: Related Content

World after Saddam's execution


Dr Chintamani Mahapatra, INFA

The US military withdrawal from Iraq should be appropriately done guarding against any further adverse consequences for the Iraqi people.

The execution of former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein has certainly eliminated a branded dictator of Iraq who had admirers and detractors within that country and abroad, but it provides no guarantee of peace or democracy within Iraq or in the region at large.

There exists a long list of Third World dictators some of whom were created, sustained and later removed from powers by the United States. The successive US Administrations were accused of having connections with several dictatorial regimes around the world. In fact, the American democracy appeared more comfortable with dictators in the developing world than other forms of governments, including nascent democracies. Ferdinand E Marcos of the Philippines, Chun Doo Hwan of South Korea, Manuel Antonio Noriega of Panama, General Zia-ul-Haq of Pakistan are but a few names who cooperated with Washington to a great extent during the Cold War days.

But the Cold War logic of US foreign policy was different. Hunted by the spectre of Communist expansions in various parts of the globe considered vital for American nations interests and the unwillingness of a large number of newly independent countries to join the American camp in the ongoing Cold War induced the US to cultivate dictators as allies. By ensuring regime stability through substantial economic military assistance, the US kept the dictators happy, masses disappointed and fulfilled its national security goals.

As and when the dictators became domestically weak and popular uprisings threatened their political positions, Washington took appropriate actions at the right time to facilitate their exit from power. Ferdinand E Marcos, a powerful Filipino dictator, was friendly to the US for about twenty years. After the assassination of Benigno Aquino, a Philippine Senator, there was a popular uprising against his rule led by Aquino's wife. When the US policy makers determined that Marcos would no longer be able to save his seat, they switched sides at an appropriate time and helped Marcos escape from that country to Hawaii.

When the South Korean people turned against Chun Doo Hwan, Washington did little to save his throne. Thousands of the US troops were stationed in that country in several military bases. The US did not consider it wise to antagonize people in such a vital country and little hesitated to remain inactive when a long standing ally was being eased out from the seat of his political power.

The story of a dictator in America's own Hemisphere, Panama, was a little different. President Noriega of Panama was a very close strategic ally of the US and was supplying intelligence information to the Central Intelligence Agency of the United States. The moment it came to be known that Noriega was also involved in drugs trade and was acting as a double agent; supplying intelligence information to even Cuba's Fidel Castro, Washington became determined to remove him from power. But he was not just removed from power after US military intervention, but was also arrested, brought to the US, tried in a court of law, convicted and then put behind bars.

The story appears to be a tragic one in the case of Saddam Hussein. He was a defiant dictator who thumbed his nose at the US for years. He was suspected to have planned an assassination of former US president and father of the current US president. He was one prominent leader in the Islamic world who did not condemn the 9/11 attack on the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon Building.

Among other real and imaginary reasons, the US militarily intervened in Iraq without any UN authorization, removed Saddam Hussein from power and then captured him alive. The US then continued to keep its troops on the ground, facilitated the establishment of an Iraqi Government and then encouraged a fair trial of Saddam Hussein by an Iraqi court. It was the Iraqi court that gave death sentence to Saddam Hussein and he was executed on a day the entire Muslim World was to celebrate the famous ID festival.

However, no one believed that execution of Saddam was an all Iraqi affair. The US hand was crystal clear in the whole process that ultimately led to Saddam execution through hanging. The European Continent was shocked, since death sentence is prohibited there. Russia accused the US of murdering Saddam Hussein. India and many other countries were utterly disappointed.

The Islamic World appears to be shocked, but divided. The Shias seem to have breathed a sigh of relief. The Sunnis are certainly enraged. There is a general apprehension that Iraq will further slide down into anarchy and a complex civil war. Could the Bush Administration have avoided this incident? Certainly, it could Why did it choose to let it go? Was it yet another demonstration of the Bush Administration's will to sustain its military efforts in Iraq? Was it a media display of the outcome that anti-US elements have to face?

These are the questions that have kept analysts and commentators around the world engaged. But there is a not-so-hidden apprehension that execution of Saddam Hussein may make things worse for the Iraqis, for West Asian countries and to the outside world as well. Incidentally, a large number of American people have condemned Saddam's execution. So are the people from several other countries. But in international affairs world public opinion do not have direct impact on policy makers.

There was a strong public opinion around the globe, including in the US against any military action against Iraq in early 2003. The Bush Administration was determined to intervene in Iraq and it did by ignoring the views in the United Nations and elsewhere. This time around the execution of Saddam Hussein was carried out in such a short time that public opinion had no time to form against any such action. Now there is only reaction and little else can be done.

But the world certainly needs to prepare against any further violence that may be caused in response to Saddam's execution. The US needs to put forward an exit strategy as soon as possible. And its military withdrawal from Iraq should be appropriately done guarding against any further adverse consequences for the Iraqi people.

Sphere: Related Content

Iraq PM warns critics of Saddam's hanging


Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki has threatened to review relations with countries that have criticised the bungled execution of former president Saddam Hussein.

Mr Maliki says the hanging was an internal matter and was conducted for the benefit of Iraq's unity.

A clandestine video showing images of Shiite officials taunting Saddam on the gallows has angered his fellow Sunnis and increased sectarian tension.

Mr Maliki, who rushed through the execution of his former enemy four days after Saddam lost an appeal, has not named any countries.

But his remarks come days after Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak joined criticism from other Sunni countries to say pictures of the hanging were "revolting and barbaric".

The Iraqi Prime Minister says Saddam received a fair trial.

"The execution of the dictator is a domestic affair," he said.

"It is related to the Iraqi people alone and we reject and condemn all official and unofficial statements made by some governments...

"The Iraqi Government may have to reconsider its relations with any country that does not respect the will of the Iraqi people."
'Not political'

Mr Maliki, a member of the Shiite majority that was oppressed under Saddam, has defended the US-backed court that tried the ousted leader.

"The execution of the tyrant was not a political decision, as the enemies of the Iraqi people are trying to show," he said.

"This decision was made after a long and fair trial the tyrant did not deserve."

Mr Maliki, who in an officially released video was seen signing the execution order in red ink, also has harsh words for international human rights groups who have criticised the execution.

"I have to remind the international community and human rights groups, where were they when the crimes of Anfal, Halabja, the mass graves and the executions took place?," he said, referring to crimes against humanity that have been blamed on Saddam.

Thousands of Sunnis have marched in protest against Saddam's execution.
Baghdad crackdown

The Prime Minister has also announced a major crackdown on both Shiite militias and Sunni insurgents in Baghdad to stem the rise of killings that are now running at hundreds a week.

Mr Maliki says commanders in each neighbourhood will come down hard on illegal groups, "regardless of their sect or politics".

He says US troops will support Iraqi forces in the crackdown.

Mr Maliki has been under pressure from Washington to stamp out death squad killings and ethnic cleansing in the city that is blamed on militias loyal to fellow Shiite leaders.

But there has been no sign of the crackdown on the streets of the capital.

Sphere: Related Content

U.N. Investigates 300 PeaceKeepers for Sexual Abuse


EDITH M. LEDERER

The United Nations has investigated more than 300 members of U.N. peacekeeping missions for alleged sexual exploitation and abuse during the past three years and more than half were fired or sent home, according to a senior U.N. official.

The announcement came as the United Nations was trying to determine whether a report in a British newspaper involved new allegations or ones the U.N. had investigated or was investigating. The Daily Telegraph report alleged U.N. personnel in southern Sudan were involved in sexual exploitation and abuse of more than 20 children.

U.N. Assistant Secretary-General for Peacekeeping Jane Holl Lute said Friday that the U.N. has done more in the last two years than ever before to try to combat sex abuse in its 16 peacekeeping missions "but we're not satisfied with where we are."

With nearly 200,000 people from more than 100 countries rotating through the peacekeeping missions every year, some people "are going to behave badly," she told a news conference. "What's different now is … our determination to stay with this problem … and constantly improve our ability to deal with it."

Between January 2004 and the end of November 2006, Lute said, the U.N. investigated allegations of sexual exploitation and abuse involving 319 peacekeeping personnel "in all missions" from East Timor, the Middle East and Africa to Kosovo and Haiti.

This resulted in the summary dismissal of 18 civilians and the repatriation of 17 international police and 144 military personnel, she said.

According to the Department of Peacekeeping, during the first 10 months of 2006, 63 percent of all misconduct allegations involving peacekeeping personnel were related to sexual exploitation and abuse, a third of them to prostitution.

While allegations of abuse have dogged peacekeeping missions since their inception more than 50 years ago, the issue was thrust into the spotlight after the United Nations found in early 2005 that peacekeepers in Congo had sex with Congolese women and girls, usually in exchange for food or small sums of money.

Jordan's U.N. Ambassador Prince Zeid al Hussein wrote a report several months later that described the U.N. military arm as deeply flawed and recommended withholding the salaries of the guilty and requiring nations to pursue legal action against perpetrators. It said abuses had been reported in missions ranging from Bosnia and Kosovo to Cambodia, East Timor, West Africa and Congo.

The U.N. peacekeeping department instituted a new code of conduct for peacekeepers and new training for officers and all U.N. personnel, and it reinforced messages of "zero tolerance" for sexual abuse.

A new anti-prostitution campaign is about to start "to target what has been a troubling pathway for sexual exploitation and abuse in the missions," Lute said.

Meanwhile, the Department of Peacekeeping corrected information it supplied Thursday that four U.N. peacekeepers from Bangladesh have been sent home and 13 other peacekeepers serving in southern Sudan are under investigation for alleged serious misconduct including sexual exploitation and abuse.

According to the department, there are currently 13 sexual exploitation and abuse cases under investigation by the U.N. Office of Internal Oversight Services in Sudan (OIOS), half in southern Sudan.

These cases include an investigation into an allegation of sexual exploitation and abuse in June 2006 against a Bangladeshi peacekeeper in southern Sudan. While the OIOS investigation is continuing, the department said the peacekeeper was sent home and dismissed from the army.

In addition, three Bangladeshi guards on duty when the alleged incident took place and two officers were repatriated for poor supervision or poor command. The Bangladeshi army dismissed one guard, lowered the rank of the two others, and severely reprimanded the two officers, the Peacekeeping Department said.



Sphere: Related Content

Villagers shot dead in NE India


At least 30 people have been killed in two days of attacks by suspected separatist rebels in the north-eastern Indian state of Assam, police say.

The United Liberation Front of Assam (ULFA), is suspected of carrying out the shootings.

Twelve villagers were shot dead in Tinsukia district on Saturday, while on Friday 18 people died in four co-ordinated attacks.

Most of the victims are said to be Hindi-speaking migrants.

In another incident on Friday, a bomb exploded on a railway line between Delhi and Dibrugarh.

No-one has claimed responsibility for the attacks, but police say the ULFA is likely to be behind them.

Violence in the state has increased since talks between the ULFA and the government broke down in September last year.

The rebels are seeking a separate homeland for the Assamese people and demanding the departure of the non-indigenous population, particularly Hindi speakers.

They have been fighting Delhi's rule in the tea and oil-rich state for the past 27 years.

Security officials say attacks could intensify ahead of India's Republic Day celebrations on 26 January.

Sphere: Related Content

2007 to Be Warmest Year on Record, Forecasters Say


John Roach
National Geographic News


An El Niño weather phenomenon combined with high levels of greenhouse gases are likely to make 2007 the warmest year ever recorded, British climate scientists said today.

U.S. government scientists agree with the assessment.


According to the British forecasters, 2007 will probably be 0.97 degree Fahrenheit (0.54 degree Celsius) above the long-term average of 57 degrees Fahrenheit (14 degrees Celsius).

The current record holder, 1998, was 0.94 degree Fahrenheit (0.52 degree Celsius) above the long-term average. (The average is calculated from the years 1961 to 1990.)

This is the seventh year that the United Kingdom Met Office's Hadley Centre for Climate Change in Devon has released their forecast. Over the years the forecast has been remarkably accurate, with a margin of error of 0.1 degree Fahrenheit (0.06 degree Celsius).

According to the researchers, there is a 60 percent chance that 2007 will be the warmest on record. (Related: "Global Warming Likely Causing More Heat Waves, Scientists Say" [August 1, 2006].)

David Parker is a climate-variability scientist with the Hadley Centre who helped prepare the forecast.

The new calculations add to the "ongoing evidence that global warming is real and is sort of getting worse," he said.

Warm Water

According to Parker, 2007's record-breaking warmth will result from an El Niño weather pattern that is riding on top of warmer global temperatures caused by greenhouse gas emissions. (Related: "Hurricane Season May Fizzle Further Due to El Nino" [September 5, 2006].)

El Niño is a periodic warming of the tropical Pacific Ocean off the northwest coast of South America that affects climate all around the globe.

"It puts more heat into the air, and that gets carried around the world by the wind," Parker said.

This warm El Niño air adds to global temperatures already boosted by increasing levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, he added.

Scientists believe greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide produced from the burning of coal and oil, are driving up global temperatures by nearly 0.36 degree Fahrenheit (0.2 degree Celsius) per decade, Parker said.

So when El Niño warming combines with greenhouse gas warming, record-breaking heat is likely.

"Generally the greenhouse gas warming provides the long-term warming and the El Niño provides the interannual variability," Parker said.

There was a strong El Niño in 1998, the current warmest-year record holder.

U.S. Agreement

Thomas Karl is the director of the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's National Climatic Data Center in Asheville, North Carolina.

He said the British forecast makes sense given the moderate El Niño already in place.

"This, in combination with the observed and projected increases in atmospheric greenhouse gases, will likely produce a record warm year in 2007, averaged across the globe," he said by email.

Karl added that with each succeeding El Niño event, new warmest-year records are likely to be set.

"This does not imply that it is only during El Niños we could see new record highs. But in general temperatures will continue to rise as greenhouse gases increase," he said.

But, he added, a major volcanic eruption could throw thick clouds of light-blocking chemicals into the air and "upset such a prediction."

Sphere: Related Content

A French prisoner eats part of his cellmates body.

A French prisoner who killed his cellmate "very probably" ate some of the victim's body parts, a prosecutor in the northern town of Rouen said on Friday.

The victim's body was discovered in a prison cell on Wednesday, with a large wound to the chest. The alleged killer, who shared the cell, told investigators he had removed and eaten his victim's heart.

Investigators initially discounted the possibility of cannibalism after the victim's heart was "found intact in its usual place and in its membrane which was also intact," Rouen state prosecutor Joseph Schmit said in a statement.

However an autopsy revealed that pieces of muscle from the victim's rib area and part of his lung were missing.

"The absence of these anatomic elements, which have not been found on the scene of the crime, render the confessions of cannibalism by the presumed perpetrator of the crime very probable," Schmit said.

The case comes less than a year after a court in Germany sentenced Armin Meiwes, the cannibal who killed and ate a willing victim, to life in prison.

The alleged Rouen killer and another cellmate who admitted he had not been asleep at the time of the crime, were in temporary custody and would be placed under formal investigation for premeditated murder, Schmit said.bb

Sphere: Related Content

Saddam's Execution Was a Gargantuan PR Disaster


Matt Taibbi

RollingStone.com


When will we recognize that the best thing we can do in Iraq is to get out of there?

"The president's view is that in the absence of a U.N. endorsement, this war will become 'self-legitimating' when the world sees most Iraqis greet U.S. troops as liberators. I think there is a good chance that will play out." -- Thomas Friedman, New York Times, March 2003

I thought of Thomas Friedman over the weekend as I watched the United States proudly gallop into its 9,598th consecutive gargantuan p.r. fuckup in Iraq, better known to the rest of the world as the execution of Saddam Hussein. In fact, I thought specifically of the above-mentioned column of Friedman's, written right on the eve of the initial invasion almost four years ago.

It was in that particular column ("D-Day," March 19, 2003) that Friedman long-windedly lamented President Bush's failure to secure broader international support for his invasion, which he feared would detract from the legitimacy of the operation. This was a blow to the Iraq war effort, in Friedman's mind (excuse me: in what passes for Friedman's mind), but in that "D-Day" piece of his he said that we could all still make things work in Iraq -- all we had to do, he said, was to "turn these lemons into lemonade."

Lemons into lemonade! That line has been stuck in my head throughout this war. It would be absolutely impossible to find a better example of just exactly why we should never have gone into Iraq.

Remember that this war was cooked up by American bureaucrats, people who know an awful lot more about bowling than they do about Islam. True, there were a few genuine lunatics involved in dreaming up the invasion -- that crazy fraternity of neocon academics, wannabe revolutionaries who spent the whole 1990s bitter about Clinton and wired on coffee and Goldwater biographies, waiting for their Big Chance. Those people came up with the specific details of the Iraq plan (when, where, ostensibly why) and it's doubtful that anyone else but a lunatic could have dreamed up those particulars, since their logic generally eludes the sane and the normal.

But the engine behind this entire escapade was really the great mass of ordinary Beltway apparatchiks and media creatures who cheerfully assented once the idea squirted out of Bush's mouth. You're talking about a bunch of half-bright golfers from the Virginian suburbs, people raised on Archie comics and fuzzy patriotic platitudes and old saws gleaned from William Holden war movies and their postwar corporate-executive Dads. They went for the war because people they trusted told them it was a good idea, and some of them even ended up running parts of the operation, either in Iraq or in positions of responsibility here at home.

Tom Friedman is the oracle of this crowd, the tormented fat kid with a wedgie who got smart in his high school years and figured out that all he had to do to be successful was shamelessly and relentlessly flatter his Greatest-Generation parents, stroke their outdated prejudices, sell them on the idea that the entire aim of the modernization process is the spreading of their amazing legacy through the use of space-age technology.

So he goes into America's sleepy suburbs with his seventies porn-star mustache and he titillates the book clubs full of bored fifty- and sixty-something housewives with tales of how the internet is going to turn Afghanistan into Iowa. The suburban guys he ropes in with a half-baked international policy analysis -- whats "going on" on "the Street," as Friedman usually puts it -- that he cleverly makes sound like the world's sexiest collection of stock tips: "So I was playing golf with the Saudi energy minister last week, and he told me..."

This is just a modern take on the same old bullshit rap that traveling salesmen all over America have been laying on wide-eyed yokels at 99 Steak Houses and Howard Johnsons hotel bars for decades: So I was having lunch with Jack Welch at the Four Seasons last week when I heard about this amazing opportunity... And these middle-manager types who live in Midwestern cubicles or in the bowels of some federal bureaucracy in Maryland eat it up; they buy every one of Friedman's books, treat his every word like gospel, and before you know it they're all talking about Israeli politics and "the situation" in Yemen or Turkey or wherever like they're experts.

And so this is how we got where we are. You get a whole nation full of people who spend 99% of their free time worrying about their lawns or their short iron game, you convince them that they know something about something they actually know nothing about, and next thing you know, they're blundering into a 1000-year blood feud between rival Islamic groups, shooting things left and right in a panic, and thinking that they get make it all right and correct each successive fuckup by "keeping our noses to the grindstone" and "making lemons out of lemonade."

The whole war has been characterized by this kind of behavior. The Americans continually make ghastly mistake after ghastly mistake, and they keep responding to their mistakes by digging down and seeking the aid of the same homespun American pseudo-folk wisdom that got them into this mess in the first place. Our foreign policy initiatives in the area resemble attempts to mend fences with a neighbor whose lawn has been mussed by bringing him a tuna casserole cooked specially by wifey; only in Iraq, when casserole-presenting Dad ends up with his eyes gouged out and his skull charred black, hanging upside down from a telephone wire and impaled on the shards of the casserole dish, the neighborhood committee convenes and... decides to bake a bigger casserole.

This is what I was thinking about this weekend, when the U.S. and the news media "celebrated" the hanging of Saddam Hussein by wallpapering the planet with video images of the execution on New Year's Eve. The execution was a complete and utter fiasco. When what is supposed to be a p.r. coup for the United States devolves into a situation where a crowd of Shia fanatics is chanting "Moqtada! Moqtada! Moqtada!" under the swinging feet of a new Sunni martyr, something has gone horribly wrong.

Not only did Saddam's execution serve notice to the entire world that the United States has essentially become the easily-manipulated muscle for Shiite extremists in Iraq, but it infuriated the entire Sunni world by its timing -- the execution coincided with the Islamic holiday Eid.

Moreover, the U.S. even managed to alienate Shiites around the world by intervening in the execution process -- not enough to stop or slow the execution, mind you, but just enough to take Saddam's body away from the Shiites and force them to deliver it back to Saddam's home city or a "decent burial."

Now we've pissed off both the Shiites and the Sunnis and gotten both sides markedly more pissed off with each other (not just in Iraq but around the world), and we've done so by accelerating the execution of a prominent Sunni politician whose fate was the one card the United States was really holding with a Sunni minority already deeply upset at being made the subjects -- at the end of an American bayonet -- to a Shiite-led government.

Not only that, but the execution put the finishing touches on the "Democracy lesson" we've supposedly been giving the Iraqi people, who, thanks to this move, still have yet to experience a government where a leader can leave power without losing his life. That is some interesting-tasting lemonade, I must say.

Rhetorical question: if you're going to offend the earth's entire Sunni population by letting a Shiite mob hang a prominent Sunni politician on a Muslim holiday -- on television on a Muslim holiday -- why bother interfering in the burial question? Seriously, why? To curry favor with the Sunnis? Because it's "the right thing" to do? What kind of deranged lunatic hangs "the Sunni sword" at the end of Ramadan and then tries to make up for it with the world's Sunnis by allowing a "civilized" burial? "We will all become a bomb," is how one Palestinian responded to this latest act of decency and goodwill on the part of the United States.

I'm not saying Saddam Hussein deserved to live. Fuck Saddam Hussein. The point is that his execution is a symbol of America's cultural blindness. America has one gear in its head: Saddam was a monster and a mass-murderer, so he should be executed and everyone should love us for doing it. Right? I mean, who doesn't like a tuna casserole?

Friedman, it must be said, predicted that we might have such troubles. Nearly four years ago, he came up with a clever way of phrasing what he meant, saying that the Bush team needed an "attitude lobotomy," that it needed to "get off its high horse" and "start engaging people on the World Street, listening to what's bothering them, and also telling them what's bothering us." He also said that we needed something like the Marshall Plan, something that was "both a hand out and a hand up." This was "D-Day for our generation," he said.

That was our attitude on the eve of war -- we sounded like we were preparing for a sales conference in Memphis, not a Middle Eastern bloodbath. It was like nobody in America noticed that all this catchy talk about high horses and handouts and hand ups was completely meaningless to anyone except the sloe-eyed residents of the American suburbs, people raised on this language of corporate memos and canned efficiency slogans and pep talks. If George Bush had gone on al-Jazeera after the invasion and promised to "get off his high horse," the Arab world would have stared back in amazement. What horse? What the fuck is he talking about? Why does this man invade us and then start talking about a horse? Are these people crazy?

That didn't happen, but it might as well have, because we're still doing basically the same thing. This isn't a pile of lemons we're dealing with, and there's no way to make it into lemonade. This is the Middle East, a place populated with Muslim people, and we know absolutely nothing about them and have no business being there. There's no horse to get off and no one here is looking for a hand out or a hand up. They just want us to get the fuck out of there. How long is it going to take for people to figure this out?

Sphere: Related Content

Saddam execution video leads to arrests

Iraqi authorities reported the arrests Wednesday of two guards and an official who supervised Saddam Hussein's hanging and said the guard force was infiltrated by outsiders who taunted the former leader and shot the video showing his body dangling at the end of a rope.

The unauthorized video, which ignited protests by Saddam's fellow Sunni Arabs in various Iraqi cities, threatens to turn the ousted dictator into a martyr. Saddam was shown never bowing his head as he faced death, and asking the hecklers if they were acting in a manly way.

Tags: bowing | video | UNAUTHORIZED | threatens | taunted | supervised | shown | showing | shot | reported | protests | outsiders | ousted | official | MARTYR | manly | leads | leader | INFILTRATED | ignited | hecklers | GUARD | fellow | faced | execution | Dictator | dangling | Cities | authorities | Asking | arrests | acting | Wednesday | Sunni | Saddam | Politics | IRAQI | HUSSEIN | Arabs

Sphere: Related Content

CNN Apologizes for Mistaken Headline

CNN apologized Tuesday for mistakenly promoting a story on the search for Osama bin Laden with the headline "Where's Obama?"


A spokesman for Illinois Sen. Barack Obama said the apology was accepted.


The blunder came Monday evening on Wolf Blitzer's news show "The Situation Room." Both Soledad O'Brien and Blitzer offered separate apologies during CNN's morning show Tuesday.


CNN called it a "bad typographical error" by its graphics department.


"We want to apologize for that bad typo," Blitzer said. "We also want to apologize personally to Sen. Barack Obama. I'm going to be making a call to him later this morning to offer my personal apology."


Tommy Vieto, Obama's press secretary, said he appreciated the bloggers and activists who brought the error to light so quickly and helped make sure it was corrected.


"Though I'd note that the `s' and `b' keys aren't all that close to each other, I assume it was just an unfortunate mistake, and don't think there was any truly malicious intent," Vieto said.[/q]

Tags: Vieto | unfortunate | typo | truly | Secretary | Promoting | news | mistakenly | Mistake | malicious | Keys | intent | helped | headline | going | error | blunder | bloggers | assume | appreciated | Apology | activists | wolf | tuesday | Soledad | situation | People | Osama | Obama | O'Brien | Monday | mistaken | LADEN | Illinois | CNN | BLITZER | Barack

Sphere: Related Content

Oprah's £20m ($40m) school proves she's not all talk

Oprah Winfrey, the talk show star and media mogul, likes to make friends through generosity, famously once giving every member of her studio audience a free car to take home. Yesterday, however, she celebrated giving of a slightly less frivolous kind.


Surrounded by American celebrities, Winfrey, listed as the richest black person on the planet, presided over the opening of a school for disadvantaged girls just outside Johannesburg, South Africa, built with $40m (£20m) of her own money and set to begin classes on Friday.

Tags: studio | slightly | richest | Proves | PRESIDED | opening | mogul | member | Media | M | listed | likes | giving | girls | generosity | frivolous | Friends | famously | DISADVANTAGED | Classes | CELEBRATED | built | audience | winfrey | People | Oprah | Johannesburg | American | Africa

Sphere: Related Content

One Killed in Southern Indiana Plane Crash

A small plane crash in southern Indiana killed a prominent businessman and philanthropist Tuesday afternoon. The accident happened about a mile east of Washington near the Daviess County Airport. Authorities say something went wrong shortly after take-off when a twin-engine Beechcraft crashed into a farm field.


Bits and pieces of tangled metal filled the bean field where the plane went down in Daviess County. The wreckage gave only a hint that this was once a plane, but the amount of damage showed every indication that something bad happened to the plane and its pilot.


"At some point that aircraft started to go west and it went down in an open field and unfortunately the pilot was pronounced dead at the scene," Todd Ringle with Indiana State Police said.


Authorities aren't releasing a lot of details on what happened with this crash, but a witness said he saw the plane go over the shops at Boyd Grain, then he heard the engine rev up and then he heard a bang.


That bang turned out to be the plane smashing into the field. Emergency crews moved out to begin recovering the body. Their task made worse because the pilot was someone they knew well.


64-year-old Abe Knepp of Montgomery was a local businessman who doubled as a chaplain at the Daviess County Jail.


"He's made a lot of contributions to the local sheriff's department here and I know from talking to some of the deputies here. He's going to be greatly missed," Ringle said.


And now it's up to the investigators to find out why this plane went down in the field. The Federal Aviation Administration and the National Transportation Safety Board will be conducting an investigation into the crash. They are expected to arrive Wednesday

Tags: twin-engine | Ringle | Daviess | Beechcraft | WRECKAGE | Unfortunately | tangled | take-off | started | southern | something | showed | shortly | scene | pronounced | prominent | Pilot | pieces | philanthropist | KILLED | INVESTIGATORS | indication | hint | happened | filled | damage | crash | Businessman | BEAN | amount | aircraft | afternoon | accident | Washington | tuesday | Todd | police | MONTGOMERY | Indiana | Emergencies | county | authorities | Airport

Sphere: Related Content

Saddam co-defendants to be executed Thurs.



QASSIM ABDUL-ZAHRA,
Associated Press

An Iraqi government official told The Associated Press on Wednesday that preparations were under way to hang two of Saddam Hussein's co-defendants on Thursday.

Al-Arabiya satellite television and Al-Furat TV, run by Iraq's major Shiite Muslim political organization, both also reported that Saddam's half brother Barzan Ibrahim, a former intelligence chief, and Awad Hamed al-Bandar, the former chief justice of the Revolutionary Court, would be put to death Thursday.

The government official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to release the information, said the exact place and time of the hangings had not been set.

The two co-defendants were originally scheduled to hang last Saturday along with Saddam.

The former Iraqi leader and the two co-defendants were convicted and sentenced to hang on Nov. 5 and the verdict was upheld by the appellate court on Dec. 26.

The hanging of Barzan and al-Bandar was delayed, however, until after the Eid al-Adha holiday, which ends Wednesday for Iraq's majority Shiites.

The holiday marks the end of the annual Muslim pilgrimage to Mecca in Saudi Arabia.

The three men were sentenced to death for the killing of 148 Sunni Muslims from the town of Dujail after a failed 1982 assassination against Saddam in the northern city.

Sphere: Related Content

Man Leaps In Front of Subway Train to Save Fellow Passenger-- Both Survive Unharmed!


CARA BUCKLEY
NYTimes

It was every subway rider’s nightmare, times two. Who has ridden along New York’s 656 miles of subway lines and not wondered: “What if I fell to the tracks as a train came in? What would I do?”

And who has not thought: “What if someone else fell? Would I jump to the rescue?”

Wesley Autrey, a 50-year-old construction worker and Navy veteran, faced both those questions in a flashing instant yesterday, and got his answers almost as quickly.

Mr. Autrey was waiting for the downtown local at 137th Street and Broadway in Manhattan around 12:45 p.m. He was taking his two daughters, Syshe, 4, and Shuqui, 6, home before work.

Nearby, a man collapsed, his body convulsing. Mr. Autrey and two women rushed to help, he said. The man, Cameron Hollopeter, 20, managed to get up, but then stumbled to the platform edge and fell to the tracks, between the two rails.

The headlights of the No. 1 train appeared. “I had to make a split decision,” Mr. Autrey said.

So he made one, and leapt.

Mr. Autrey lay on Mr. Hollopeter, his heart pounding, pressing him down in a space roughly a foot deep. The train’s brakes screeched, but it could not stop in time.

Five cars rolled overhead before the train stopped, the cars passing inches from his head, smudging his blue knit cap with grease. Mr. Autrey heard onlookers’ screams. “We’re O.K. down here,” he yelled, “but I’ve got two daughters up there. Let them know their father’s O.K.” He heard cries of wonder, and applause.

Power was cut, and workers got them out. Mr. Hollopeter, a student at the New York Film Academy, was taken to St. Luke’s-Roosevelt Hospital Center. He had only bumps and bruises, said his grandfather, Jeff Friedman. The police said it appeared that Mr. Hollopeter had suffered a seizure.

Mr. Autrey refused medical help, because, he said, nothing was wrong. He did visit Mr. Hollopeter in the hospital before heading to his night shift. “I don’t feel like I did something spectacular; I just saw someone who needed help,” Mr. Autrey said. “I did what I felt was right.”

Sphere: Related Content

Saddam execution video draws criticism


ANITA CHANG,

Associated Press Writer

Grainy cell phone video of Saddam Hussein's execution triggered international criticism Tuesday, with Britain's deputy prime minister calling the leaked images "unacceptable" and the Vatican decrying the footage as a "spectacle" violating human rights.

Meanwhile, the Italian government pushed for a U.N. moratorium on the death penalty, Cuba called the execution "an illegal act," and Sunnis in Iraq took to the streets in mainly peaceful demonstrations across the country.

The unofficial video showed a scene that stopped just short of pandemonium, during which one person is heard shouting "To hell!" at the deposed president and Saddam is heard exchanging insults with his executioners. The inflammatory footage also showed Saddam plummeting through the gallows trapdoor and dangling in death.

The grainy video appeared on the Internet and Al-Jazeera television late Saturday. On Tuesday, Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki ordered an investigation into the execution to try to uncover who taunted the former dictator, and who leaked the cell phone footage.

At the United Nations, Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon ran into trouble on his first day of work when he failed to state the U.N.'s official stance opposing capital punishment and said it should be a decision of individual countries.

"Saddam Hussein was responsible for committing heinous crimes and unspeakable atrocities against Iraqi people and we should never forget victims of his crime," Ban said in response to a reporter's question about Saddam's execution Saturday for crimes against humanity. "The issue of capital punishment is for each and every member state to decide."

His ambiguous answer put a question mark over the U.N.'s stance on the death penalty, although Ban's spokeswoman said there was no change in policy.

British Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott said those who leaked the footage should be condemned.

"I think the manner was quite deplorable really. I don't think one can endorse in any way that, whatever your views about capital punishment," Prescott said in an interview with British Broadcasting Corp. radio.

"Frankly, to get the kind of recorded messages coming out is totally unacceptable and I think whoever is involved and responsible for it should be ashamed of themselves."

The Holy See's daily, L'Osservatore Romano, lamented that "making a spectacle" of the execution had turned capital punishment into "an expression of political hubris."

The execution "represented, for the ways in which it happened and for the media attention it received, another example of the violation of the most basic rights of man," L'Osservatore wrote.

The office of Italian Premier Romano Prodi said Italy would seek the support of other countries that oppose capital punishment to put the issue of a moratorium to the U.N. General Assembly. Italy and all other European Union countries ban capital punishment.

Italy, which is one of the rotating members of the U.N. Security Council, has lobbied unsuccessfully for U.N. action against the death penalty.

On Monday, a crowd of Sunni mourners in Samarra marched to a bomb-damaged Shiite shrine, the Golden Dome, and were allowed by guards and police to enter the holy place carrying a mock coffin and photos of the former dictator.

The shrine was bombed by Sunni extremists 10 months ago, an attack that triggered the current cycle of retaliatory attacks between Sunnis and Shiites.

Communist Cuba, which allows capital punishment, called Saddam's execution "an illegal act in a country that has been driven toward an internal conflict in which millions of citizens have been exiled or lost their lives."

The Foreign Ministry statement Monday said the island nation "has a moral duty to express its point of view about the assassination committed by the occupying power."

The U.S. military had held Saddam since capturing him in December 2003 but turned him over to the Iraqi government for his execution.

Sphere: Related Content