Malaysian Leader Says "NO" To Religious Plan To Spy On Lustful Members

Malaysia's leader said state religious officials should scrap a plan to spy on unmarried Muslims to catch any immoral activities, and instead should focus on strengthening Islamic values, news reports said Friday.

The Star newspaper quoted Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi as saying the plan by officials in the conservative northern state of Terengganu to plant spies as hotel janitors or waiters to tip off the Islamic Department about improper activities would be an unacceptable invasion of privacy.

"I say there is no need for this," it quoted Abdullah as saying.

He said religious officials should stop trying to police Muslims' morals, and should work on programs to instill Islamic values in their communities, the newspaper said.

"We can take action against those who are involved in vice activities in public places, but there is no need for us to snoop, as that will infringe on people's right to privacy," the newspaper said Abdullah told Malaysian reporters Thursday during a visit to Indonesia.

Abdullah's aides were not immediately available for comment.

The spies would mainly watch for unmarried couples committing "khalwat," or "close proximity" - meaning non-chaperoned meetings between women and men. It is a crime under Malaysia's Islamic law, a separate system which does not apply to the Southeast Asian nation's substantial non-Muslim minorities.

Muslims found guilty of khalwat can be jailed for up to two months, the AP said.

Rosol Wahid, chairman of Terengganu's Islamic welfare committee, which proposed the spies, was quoted in Friday's New Straits Times newspaper as saying that their presence would "act as a deterrent" against immoral activities.

"We are not in the business of putting couples or their families to shame," Rosol said. "We are helping families and society."

However, he added that "we have more serious matters to attend to than focus on khalwat."

At least two other states' religious officials have suggested setting up similar squads in recent years. The government scuttled the plans, citing concerns over invasion of privacy.

Sphere: Related Content

Michael Jackson Party With His Less Affluent Fans

After a $3,500-a-head gala the day before, Michael Jackson attended another party in Tokyo for his less affluent fans, more than 1,000 of whom crowded a popular nightclub Friday for an evening with the reclusive pop star.

Tickets for Friday's party went for $130, a fraction of the $3,500 that several hundred fans and business people paid for a chance to meet and greet Jackson the night before at a dinner held in his honor.

Jackson offered only brief remarks at the end of that six-hour party and did not perform.

At Friday's party, guests - most in the 20s or 30s - were treated to a stage show of gospel singers, Michael Jackson impersonators, but were not given the one-on-one opportunity that "premium" ticket partygoers got the night before. Jackson watched the show from a second-floor VIP room.

Japan remains one of Jackson's strongest fan bases, and Jackson fans have been out in force since his arrival in Tokyo on Sunday.

A screaming mob greeted him at the airport and more crowded outside a popular electronics shop that gave him the run of the store after-hours the following day. Before leaving Japan, Jackson was also scheduled to tour a U.S. Army base just south of Tokyo on Saturday.

Jackson, one of the bestselling artists of all time, had lived abroad since his 2005 acquittal on child molestation charges, forsaking his Neverland Ranch in California for Bahrain, France and a castle in Ireland. He now lives in Las Vegas.

This is Jackson's second trip to Tokyo in less than a year.

"Japan is one of my favourite places to visit in the world," Jackson told the crowd Thursday, reading from a statement. "I want to thank all of you for making me the biggest-selling artist in Japan."

In comments to The Associated Press, Jackson said he is happy with his career, which he is trying to revive after his 2005 acquittal and a series of other legal battles over his personal finances.

"I've been in the entertainment industry since I was six years old," he told AP. "As Charles Dickens says, 'It's been the best of times, the worst of times.' But I would not change my career."

Jackson, 48, said he was not bitter over his succession of difficulties.

"While some have made deliberate attempts to hurt me, I take it in stride because I have a loving family, a strong faith and wonderful friends and fans who have, and continue, to support me," he said.

Sphere: Related Content

'American Idol' 4 Down 12 To Go

"American Idol" slimmed down the competition Thursday night, leaving 12 finalists to compete for the ultimate prize -- a record contract.

Antonella Barba, Sabrina Sloan, Jared Cotter and Jason "Sundance" Head were cast off by the viewer voting, which drew about 37 million calls and text messages.

The performers who made the cut were Blake Lewis, LaKisha Jones, Chris Sligh, Jordin Sparks, Phil Stacey, Melinda Doolittle, Brandon Rogers, Gina Glocksen, Chris Richardson, Stephanie Edwards, Haley Scarnato and Sanjaya Malakar.

The show's tense final moments belonged to Malakar and Head, who were waiting to find out who would take the competition's 12th spot -- and who would go home. Judge Paula Abdul was stunned to hear that Malakar, who is not exactly a judge favorite, was staying.

"I'm speechless," Abdul said. "This is a singing competition, and Sundance, you've been one of our finest." (EW: What the heck was America thinking?external link)

How'd this happen? "The volume was turned down," quipped Simon Cowell, who has criticized Malakar, 17, of Federal Way, Washington, for his "weird" stage presence.

"Somebody give me a job," the 28-year-old Head, from Porter, Texas, said before leaving the stage. "I need a job."

The elimination of the talented Sloan, 27, from Los Angeles, was another letdown for the judges. "Sabrina should be in that top 12, dawg," lamented Randy Jackson, who said "America got that one wrong."

None of the judges was complaining when Barba, the focus of recent attention over some racy Internet photos, was shown the door. Each week, Cowell could be counted on to tell the 20-year-old Jersey girl that she wasn't good enough to be in the talent contest.

Cotter, a strapping 25-year-old from Kew Gardens, New York, told Ryan Seacrest he was "very" surprised to be leaving the show. Cowell had another opinion: "You're a good-looking guy, you've got to work on your vocals," he said.

After the show, the finalists made their debut before a bank of TV cameras and reporters, walking a mini-red carpet at an event in West Hollywood, California.

Among the women, some of the highest praise from judges and observers has gone to Jones. Asked how it feels to be dubbed a front-runner, the former bank employee replied with a modest smile.

"Have I? I haven't been paying attention," Jones said.

Many have said the female contestants have been stronger vocally than the men this season. "I think it's a girl's one to lose this year," Jackson said. "May the best girl win."

But the men had mixed reactions to comments about the opposing gender's talent.

"I'm a little tired of it, actually," Rogers said.

"Yeah," Lewis chimed in. "The girls have got powerful voices but I think the guys have been holding it down."

Stacey, however, conceded "the women are smoking us," but added he expected the men to step it up.

Thursday's show also featured a performance by "American Idol" winner Carrie Underwood, who recently snagged a Grammy for best new artist. She sang "Wasted," a song from her hit country music album "Some Hearts."

So far this season, the show's sixth, men and women have been competing separately, with viewers voting off two of each sex weekly. When the dozen finalists return Tuesday, the sexes will be blended, with one singer voted off each week. The winner will be chosen in May.

"American Idol" continues to dominate the ratings, attracting between 27 million and 37 million viewers per telecast this season.

Sphere: Related Content

American Idol 6' reveals Top 12 finalists, Antonella Barba sent home

Christopher Rocchio,

The sixth season of American Idol revealed its 12 finalists during last night's live results show, which also saw 20-year-old Point Pleasant, NJ native Antonella Barba finally be sent home by viewers.

Along with Barba, the other three semifinalists eliminated were Jared Cotter, a 25-year-old from Kew Gardens, NY; Sundance Head, a 28-year-old from Porter, TX; and Sabrina Sloan, a 27-year-old from Studio City, CA. While Head and Sloan's eliminations were surprising, the elimination of Barba -- considered to be a less talented singer -- was the most noteworthy. Barba had remained as a semifinalist in the competition despite both poor singing performances as well as the emergence of numerous provocative photos that captured viewers' attention over the past three weeks.

Barba sang "Put Your Records On" during Wednesday night's live performance episode, after which judge Simon Cowell predicted an end to her Idol journey. Upon being eliminated, Idol host Ryan Seacrest told Barba she had "grown up a lot" since she first auditioned for the reality competition series last fall. Seacrest also asked what memories Barba will take from her Idol experience.

"So many... too many. I can't even think about it right now," said a tearful Barba. "Great ones, but..."

Cowell and fellow judges Paula Abdul and Randy Jackson were more surprised with the eliminations of Head and Sloan than those of Barba and Cotter. On Tuesday night's performance episode, Head sang "Jeremy." While the judges thought it wasn't his best performance, they seemed to anticipate the elimination of 17-year-old Federal Way, WA native Sanjaya Malakar instead of Head.

"I'm speechless. I am. This is a singing competition and Sundance, you've been one of our finest. It's mind boggling," said Abdul upon learning of Head's elimination. Following Head's first audition for the sixth season of Idol, in which he sang "Stormy Monday," Cowell had commented, "I'm going to be amazed if you don't make the finals." When the votes were revealed and Head was sent packing, Cowell did look amazed.

"Simon, what happened?" Seacrest asked Cowell, who answered, "the volume was turned down," accusing viewers of not voting based on Head's vocal performances. Added Jackson, "It's crazy... wild night." Head used his final moments on Idol to make his case.

"Aright, somebody give me a job. I need a job," he said.

Like with Head and Malakar, the judges seemed to anticipate the elimination of 24-year-old San Antonio, TX native Haley Scarnato instead of Sloan, who sang "Don't Let Go" during Wednesday night's performance episode.

"Sabrina should be in the Top 12 dog... she definitely put it down. America got that one wrong I think," said Jackson.

Cotter sang "If You Really Love Me" during Tuesday night's performance episode, and upon being eliminated, he said he was "very" surprised but assured Seacrest he was "still gonna do [his] thing."

"Well obviously you've proved you're very talented... and you've certainly won a lot of fans here," Abdul told Cotter after she gave him a standing ovation. "So I think it's time for you to continue your dream." Commented Cowell, "You're a good looking guy, but you've got to work on your vocals. That's why you're not in the Top 12." Jackson thought Cotter needed to better distinguish himself from others to succeed in the music industry.

"Originality baby. Find out what makes you different from all of the other ones... originality, that's what you need," said Jackson.

Last night was also a milestone of sorts for American Idol, as it marked the reality competition series' 200th episode. To celebrate, American Idol 4 winner Carriew Underwood performed "Wasted," the fourth single from her debut album "Some Hearts." Idol Gives Back was also revealed last night. Raising awareness and funds for organizations that provide relief programs to help children and young people in extreme poverty in America and Africa, the two-night special is scheduled to air Tuesday, April 24 at 8PM ET and Wednesday, April 25 at 8PM ET.

Almost 37 million votes came in to determine the Top 12 hopefuls, one of which will eventually be named the sixth season American Idol. Fox will air a special two-hour performance episode live next Tuesday, March 13 at 8PM ET, when the finalists will celebrate the music of Diana Ross. The following night beginning at 9PM ET, Ross will perform and one finalist will be eliminated from the competition on the live results show.

Sphere: Related Content

Is It Time For Associated Press To Ignore Paris Hilton?


So you may have heard: Paris Hilton was ticketed the other day for driving with a suspended license.

Not huge news, even by celebrity-gossip standards. Here at The Associated Press, we put out an initial item of some 300 words. But it actually meant more to us than that.

It meant the end of our experimental blackout on news about Paris Hilton.

It was only meant to be a weeklong ban — not the boldest of journalistic initiatives, and one, we realized, that might seem hypocritical once it ended. And it wasn’t based on a view of what the public should be focusing on — the war in Iraq, for example, or the upcoming election of the next leader of the free world, as opposed to the doings of a partygoing celebrity heiress/reality TV star most famous for a grainy sex video.

No, editors just wanted to see what would happen if we didn’t cover this media phenomenon, this creature of the Internet gossip age, for a full week. After that, we’d take it day by day. Would anyone care? Would anyone notice? And would that tell us something interesting?

It turned out that people noticed plenty — but not in the way that might have been expected. None of the thousands of media outlets that depend on AP called in asking for a Paris Hilton story. No one felt a newsworthy event had been ignored. (To be fair, nothing too out-of-the-ordinary happened in the Hilton universe.)

The reaction was to the idea of the ban, not the effects of it. There was some internal hand-wringing. Some felt we were tinkering dangerously with the news. Whom, they asked, would we ban next? Others loved the idea. “I vote we do the same for North Korea,” one AP writer said facetiously.

No happy birthday from AP
The experiment began on Feb. 19. A few days before, the AP had written from Austria about Hilton’s appearance at the Vienna Opera ball, just ahead of her 26th birthday. We didn’t cover her weekend birthday bash in Las Vegas.

During “blackout week,” the AP didn’t mention Hilton’s second birthday party at a Beverly Hills restaurant, at which a drunken friend reportedly was ejected by security after insulting Paula Abdul and Courtney Love. And editors asked our Puerto Rico bureau not to write about her visit there to hawk her fragrance. However, her name did slip into copy unintentionally three times, as background: in stories about Britney Spears, Nicole Richie, and even in the lead of a story about Democrats in Las Vegas.

Then Hilton was arrested on Feb. 27 for driving with a suspended license — an offense that could conceivably lead to jail time because she may have violated conditions of a previous sentence. By that time, our blackout was over anyway, so reporting the development was an easy call. (On the flip side, we never got to see what repercussions there would have been if we hadn’t.)

Also by then, an internal AP memo about the ban had found its way to the outside world. The New York Observer quoted it on Wednesday, and the Gawker.com gossip site linked to it. Howard Stern was heard mentioning the ban on his radio show, and calls came in from various news outlets asking us about it. On Editor and Publisher magazine’s Web site, a reader wrote: “This is INCREDIBLE, finally a news organization that can see through this evil woman.” And another: “You guys are my heroes!”

We felt a little sheepish that the ban was over, and braced ourselves for the comments that would come when people realized it wasn’t permanent.

We also learned that Lloyd Grove, former columnist for the New York Daily News, had attempted a much longer Paris Hilton blackout. He began it a year into his “Lowdown” column and stuck to it, he says, for two years until the column was discontinued last October — except for a blind item (no names) about Hilton crashing a pre-Oscar party.

So was Grove attempting to raise the level of discourse in our society by focusing on truly newsworthy subjects?

Well, not really. “The blackout was a really heartfelt attempt on my part,” he says, “to get publicity for myself.”

A trait that Hilton, it must be said, has turned into an art. Grove thinks the so-called “celebutante” achieved her unique brand of fame because she boasts an irresistible set of traits: wealth, a big name, beauty with a “downmarket” appeal, and a tendency to seem ... oversexed. “This is what mainstream society celebrates,” he says. “She is, in the worst sense, the best expression of the maxim that no bad deed goes unrewarded in our pop culture.”

Undeniable level of fame
One measure of Hilton’s fame: She was No. 5 last year on the Yahoo Buzz Index, a list of overall top searches on the Web site (her ever-so-brief buddy Spears is a perennial No. 1).

Another is that US Weekly has at least a mention or a photo in just about every issue. “People now come to expect to see pictures of her,” says Caroline Schaefer, deputy editor of the celebrity magazine. “They’re intrigued by her unshakable self-esteem. People are fascinated by that.”

Jeff Jarvis, who teaches journalism at the City University of New York, decries the “one-size-fits-all disease” afflicting media outlets, who feel that “everybody’s covering it, so we must, too.” Even The New York Times, he noted, had substantial coverage of a hearing concerning where Anna Nicole Smith — perhaps the one person who rivaled Hilton in terms of fame for fame’s sake — would be buried.

“That disease leads to the Paris Hilton virus spreading through the news industry,” says Jarvis, who puts out the BuzzMachine blog.

So what have we learned from the ban? “It’s hard to tell what this really changes, since we didn’t have to make any hard decisions,” says Jesse Washington, AP’s entertainment editor. “So we’ll continue to use our news judgment on each item, individually.”

Which means that for the immediate future, if not always, we’ll still have Paris.

Sphere: Related Content

Paris Hilton’s biggest fan is — Paris Hilton.


Birthday visitors to the partying heiress’ home in the Hollywood Hills were startled to see the number of portraits of Paris Hilton.

“Upon entry, guests were handed silver pens and told to write gushing messages on a gigantic portrait of the ever-modest party hostess,” a reporter from the London Mirror noted.

Hanging in the living room was an enormous picture of Hilton, and when guests entered the dining room — yet another “gargantuan” portrait of the heiress.

Revelers were treated to fortune cookies, and the message inside each of them was the same: “Happy Birthday Paris.”

Sphere: Related Content

Britney Spears' Life in Rehab - Not A Happy One


Angie Fenton

The Courier-Journal

Us Weekly says Britney Spears isn’t happy about being in rehab, since she believes her troubles were caused by post-partum depression and not an addiction to drugs and alcohol.

Spears, 25, has been at Promises rehab center in Malibu — price tag: $48,000 a month — for two weeks now.

“The doctors there do say that they are shocked by what bad shape she is in,” Us Weekly contributing editor Katrina Szish told “The Early Show” co-host Julie Chen. “So the people at the clinic do seem to believe she’s in the right place.”

But Spears isn’t so sure.

“Unfortunately, Britney has managed to stay in rehab, but she’s not been an ideal patient. She’s been talking on her cell phone too often. She’s been reprimanded for that. She’s actually ducked out of rehab to go shopping for several hours, Szish said.
Spears has found an unlikely support system in estranged hubby Kevin Federline and her mother, Lynn.

“Kevin has really been a rock for her, as has her mother,” Szish said.

“About a week or so ago, Britney did have a visit with her kids,” she said. “Kevin and her mom, Lynn, brought the kids to the facility. And reports say she was just thrilled to see them.”

Still, Szish said, “We’re hearing that (while) Britney is doing this for her kids, (she) is a bit angry because she felt she was pushed into it, forced into it by her manager and her family. And is a little bit resentful of the fact that she is in this facility. But knows she has to do something for her kids.”

Sphere: Related Content

Megachurch Lay Off Staff Due To Low Income

The megachurch founded by the Reverend Ted Haggard, who was fired over drug and sex allegations, has laid off 44 people amid falling income following the scandal.

The cuts, announced during services in Colorado Springs, Colorado, on Sunday, amount to about 12% of the church's work force, associate pastor Rob Brendle said.

Brendle estimated that church income has fallen 10% since the scandal broke last fall, forcing layoffs including pastoral staff, support staff, and nursery workers.

''The reality is, we ask our people to be faithful stewards of their money and living within their means. We have to do the same,'' Brendle said.

Ross Parsley, the church's interim senior pastor, said some positions will be consolidated and that volunteers could replace some paid staff. The 14,000-member church had experienced 22 years of attendance and financial growth, Brendle said.

Haggard was fired in November after a male escort alleged that Haggard used methamphetamine in his presence and paid him for sex. Haggard has acknowledged ''sexual immorality.'' He also stepped down as president of the National Association of Evangelicals.

Sphere: Related Content

USCIS Advises I-130 Petitioners Overseas Not To Re-File


Processing Continues on Petitions for Alien Relative WASHINGTON – U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) advises anyone who filed a Petition for Alien Relative, (Form I-130) with an American embassy or consulate since July 2006 that they do not need to re-file the petition. USCIS is working with the Department of State to process those petitions.The Department of State announced in January 2007 that certain requirements of the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act (enacted in July 2006) precluded them from accepting new petitions.U.S. citizens who live abroad may continue to file new petitions with a nearby USCIS international office. A list of offices and the countries they service is on the USCIS web site: http://www.uscis.gov/.USCIS expects to issue instructions for new filings in the near future and will provide updated information once the details have been finalized with the Department of State.Petitioners traveling overseas who actually live in the United States must file their I-130 petitions with the appropriate USCIS service center in the United States, according to the instructions on the form, http://www.uscis.gov/files/form/I-130.pdf.

Sphere: Related Content

Did 2006 Change US congressional election?




Steve Fraser

TO begin with, polls indicate that the election represented an explicit repudiation of the Republican Party as a party; at least, as explicit as one could possibly expect in a midterm election. Try as they did to argue beforehand that all elections are local, Republican leaders knew that not to be the case, not this time; indeed, that's precisely why they traipsed around the country vociferously denying what they deeply feared was true.
Under normal circumstances and by its very nature, in the American electoral system -- monopolised by two amorphously constituted parties of little distinct ideological or programmatic identity, and with its multiple disincentives to any kind of independent party representation -- it is usually excruciatingly hard to register voter sentiment on behalf of a party rather than a candidate. But the election of 2006 was not normal in this regard. There are indications that significant numbers of Americans voted against the Republican Party and, with less enthusiasm to be sure, for the Democratic Party.
Perhaps most tellingly, in numerous races moderate Republicans, who remained quite popular with their constituents and had enjoyed long tenure in office -- the best known case is Lincoln Chafee in Rhode Island -- succumbed to Democrats who were often no more to the "left" than they were. Notwithstanding the inherent fuzziness of what either of the parties stands for, voters seemed ready to conclude that the Republican Party and the administration of George Bush could be fairly associated with the disaster in Iraq, the shameful incompetence and callousness of the response to Hurricane Katrina, the rank and systemic corruption associated with lobbyist Jack Abramoff, and the crony capitalism of the oil companies and Halliburton. Voting for the Democratic Party was a way of repudiating all that, even if any particular Republican candidate might be blameless.
Then, there is the matter of the "Blue Dogs." It turns out that rumours of their ascendancy were not so much exaggerated as mischaracterized. True enough Senate candidates like Bob Casey in Pennsylvania or James Webb in Virginia were well-known supporters of such social conservative causes as gun ownership or the "right to life." But these were hardly the issues they ran on. On the contrary, the campaigns of Webb and Casey, not to mention Sherrod Brown's Senate campaign in Ohio and those of many fellow "Blue Dogs" running for House seats, stressed opposition to the war in Iraq and anger directed at big pharma, big oil, tax breaks for the rich, and free-trade globalization agreements like NAFTA.
Far more often than not, economic populism, not social conservatism, is what lent the Democrats, and in particular the Blue Dogs, an edge.
This same sentiment could be felt, both before and immediately after the election, in the overwhelming support for a quick Congressional move to raise the minimum wage and to empower Medicare to lower prescription drug prices by bargaining with the big pharmaceuticals. Even more remarkable, given the perilous state of the labour movement, is the emergence of a House majority in favour of the Employee Free Choice Act, a bill that would make it easier for millions of workers to join unions, a development critical to shifting the balance of political and economic power.
It would be premature to speak of a fully formed populist/New Deal-like alternative within the Democratic Party or to suggest that people were voting for such a possibility in 2006. Nonetheless, when the Democratic leadership anointed its opening agenda as the new governing party in Congress with the resonant phrase "the first 100 hours," echoing FDR's first 100 days, there was nothing accidental about it.
So, too, certain demographic and geopolitical trends that showed up in 2006 are suggestive of changes to come. The Latino vote, which in the 2004 presidential election was relatively evenly divided between George Bush and John Kerry, went a whopping 70% for the Democrats this time. And that wasn't even the biggest percentage shift in voting behaviour from the 2004 election in favour of the Democrats. That took place among white, non-college-educated working people who, for some time, have made up the core of the conservative populist constituency of the Reagan counter-revolution. Although all the numbers are not yet in, estimates suggest that about one-half of the shift toward the Democrats came from white working-class voters.
Regionally, the Democratic Party made significant gains in the Rocky Mountain West, while clearing away the remnant outposts of Republicanism in much of the Northeast and driving Republicans from Rustbelt outposts in Ohio and Missouri. The logic of that trend -- which doesn't, of course, mean that it will be realised -- is to regionalize the Republican Party in the South. In this way, the southernization of national politics, which was the great accomplishment of the Reagan political order, might be replaced by the southernization of the Republican Party.
Even the early talk about presidential candidates seems portentous. On the Democratic side there is no one to the right of Hillary Clinton, certainly a sign of a shift in the Party's center of gravity.
But odder than that is the candidacy of Barack Obama. It seems to signal a thirst for a messiah. Such a quest can be symptomatic of many things, some bad, some not as bad.
Obamaism is a real mystery. Others have already noted that messiahs don't normally come from the middle as he most emphatically does. Moreover, the charisma that surrounds the prince of banality from Illinois is even harder to decipher, attached as it is to nothing tangible or providential as was Robert Kennedy's lightning 1968 ascension before his assassination, his candidacy held aloft, rightly or wrongly, by the energies of the antiwar and civil rights upheavals.
Something -- though it's hard to tell what -- may be blowin' in the wind.
Perhaps the better question, then, is: Will the presidential election of 2008 turn out to be a turning-point election of historic proportions. The greatest unknown is whether or not the status quo is headed for a breakdown crisis severe enough to clear the ground for such a transformative moment.
Signs certainly point in that direction. The convergence of imperial defeat, economic insecurity, and rampant corporate malfeasance might be enough all by themselves.
But the sudden change in the political status of global warming -- once the dim, background hum of some far distant disturbance, now more like the heart-stopping premonitory theme music from the soundtrack of Jaws -- magnifies the crisis of the whole global order, at home and abroad. Anatole Lieven has called it global capitalism's "existential challenge." Life as we've known it may be beginning to end. Congress is already holding hearings about the natural apocalypse to come, and all but the most ostrich-like politicians acknowledge global warming as an urgent reality; a fact-on-the-ground, so to speak, no longer a debatable theory.
The Bush administration -- and so the old order -- has staked a lot on Iraq, not just its geopolitical and global economic ambitions. Its already severely diminished status as a moral exemplar of democracy and civil liberties won't survive this latest plunge into military mayhem.
Moreover, the President's "surge" plan is a mortal threat to the secret source of the regime's strength at home. The politics of fear and imperial bravado, which once won it legions of followers, may, in the aftermath of the surge, reach its own turning point as those voters abandon ship as fast as they once climbed aboard.
Can the administration or the old order survive a fiasco of such proportions?
Iraq is also the equivalent of a budgetary bunker-busting nuclear device. It exacerbates an already aggravated economic dilemma. Despite a Noah's flood of statistics that seem to support a Pollyana-ish view that we live today in the best of economic good times, millions of Americans experience the opposite -- a yawning gulf of insecurity affecting their health, retirement, and employment prospects. They share a gloomy sense of moving backwards, of decline.
Once upon a time, poverty was associated with the super-exploitation of those who toiled for meager reward.
Then, in mid-twentieth century America, poverty came to be associated with the lack of work, with those so marginalized they were shut-out of the main avenues of modern commerce and industry. Nowadays, we are rushing back to the nineteenth century. Today, 30 million people in the United States work long and hard and still live in poverty.
Insecurity even more pervasive than this once supplied the energy responsible for supplanting laissez-faire capitalism with the New Deal.
Might we be approaching something of that scale and scope today? Though there can be no definitive answer to this, there also can be no question that a general crisis of economic insecurity confronts the old order. All of its self-serving and adventitious rhetoric about the heroics of risk fall on increasingly deaf ears.
Not incidentally, since we live in the age of the global sweatshop, that older order is now global in scope; and the international financial mechanisms that so far have kept the global system humming for the U.S. are themselves under great and increasing strain. The system is, at present, being kept aloft by the needs of China, Japan, and other major economic powers. One day soon they may find the burden of swallowing gargantuan amounts of U.S. debt insupportable.
Are we heading toward a breakdown like the one which, in the early 1970s, forced the Nixon administration to scrap the Bretton Woods financial system, the defining economic institution of the post-war Pax Americana? Together with defeat in Vietnam, the devaluation of the dollar, and the end of fixed exchange rates for international currencies exacerbated the general impasse in which the New Deal order then found itself.
When it comes to the social reputation of our corporate elite, is it necessary to say anything more than Enron? The litany of shameless profiteering, felonious behaviour, cronyism, and corruption at the apex of the private economy has arguably called into question the "right to rule" of those presiding over the country's key economic institutions. Even at the regime's hubristic height following Bush's presidential victory in 2004, he discovered he'd crossed a bridge too far in his attempt to turn over the Social Security System to Wall Street.
Trust in the corporate elite has only grown frailer since then. Cynicism mixed with rage is a potentially explosive brew that fuels the economic populism even someone as "establishment" as James Webb articulated in his alternate State of the Union Address.
What may make these converging dilemmas over-ripe for change is the response of the old order itself.
One sign that some decisive crisis has arrived is the growing incapacity of those in charge to adapt -- as if the dire nature of what's happening dries up the springs of their political imaginations, forcing them to fall back on brittle orthodoxies. Andrew Mellon's notion of liquidating everything in sight as a way out of the Great Depression was one case of mental paralysis, a retreat to what had once "worked"; after all, the periodic busts endemic to the laissez-faire capitalist life-cycle had, in the past, always cured themselves, even if the "cure" included a great deal of what we would today call "collateral damage." The Bush administration is similarly falling back on its own orthodoxies, each move only betraying just how out of touch its top officials are with the new political and social realities forming around them.
Take its reaction to the stunning electoral defeat it suffered last November. The President's new "surge" plan, the self-destructive decision to forge ahead in Iraq without a scintilla of reasonable hope of success, even from the standpoint of the most cynical imperialist, is such a reaction: instinctive, unreflective, inflexible, and probably deeply believed in.
In other words, there is a resort to the ideological fixations which have long-driven this regime -- and the larger political order from which it rose - but which only become ever more rigidified as reality bites back.
So, for another example, the administration's response to the crisis of economic insecurity has amounted to an ideological provocation shoved right in the teeth of its own electoral repudiation. Bush proposed a massive cut in Medicare and Medicaid and, even more in-your-face than that, a tax on the health insurance of those dwindling remnants of the New Deal order who still enjoy some decent level of employer-funded health care.
Everything the old regime can imagine to defend itself ends up making things worse. With some poetic license, one is reminded of an inversion of that old Marxist axiom in which the capitalists, not the proletariat, become the gravediggers of capitalism.
Of course, that is a gross exaggeration. The question of the moment is not: Will 2008 be a turning-point election, but rather can it be one?
Here, everything depends not on what the old order does on its own behalf, no matter how bone-headed, but on how the gathering forces of opposition respond to the system's crisis. Is there a willingness to build a clear, programmatic alternative inside the Democratic Party? It is, after all, an institution deeply infected with free market/free trade ideology and most of the imperial presumptions of the conservative counter-revolution.
Is there a readiness to mobilize around non-market solutions to the general crisis: To fight openly for the re-regulation of the economy and its planned re-industrialization; for its re-unionization; for redistributive policies to supplant the idée fixe of economic growth; for the dismantling of the petro-industrial complex and its replacement by a new, non-fossil-fuel system of energy production; for a global assault on the global sweatshop?
Will there be a new era of polarization rather than centrism, partisanship rather than bi-partisanship, a head-on confrontation with the Democratic Leadership Council, like the guerilla wars once waged against the John Jacob Raskob and Al Smith elite of the pre-New Deal Democratic Party or the one waged by the Goldwater legions against the silk-stocking Rockefeller Republicans? Once upon a time, someone as mild-mannered as Franklin Delano Roosevelt found it within himself to "welcome the hatred" of those he labeled "economic royalists." Might there be someone equally unafraid waiting in the wings today?
Is there a new order being born, ready to challenge the old one where it is both weakest and also strongest: namely, in the imperial arena?
Not only has global aggression proved deadly to all, depraved in its moral consequences, and life-threatening to basic democratic principles and institutions at home, but it has also been the most fruitful, life-giving incubator of the conservative cultural populism which the old order has relied on for a generation.
Anti-World War I intellectual Randolph Bourne's prophetic aperçu -- "War is the health of the State" -- needs to be made even more embracing: War has become the health of a whole political culture, not to mention the vast, hard-wired military-industrial apparatus with which it lives in symbiotic bliss. Is there a will to take on that system of cherished phobias, delusional consolations, and implacable interests?
Finally, there is the X factor, most unknowable of all, but also most critical in converting a mere election into something more transformative. Might a social movement or movements emerge from outside the boundaries of conventional politics, catalytic enough to fundamentally alter the prevailing metabolism of political life?
Might the mass demonstrations of immigrants portend something of that kind? Might the anti-war movement soon enter a period of more sustained and varied opposition in the face of this administration's barbaric obtuseness? Straws in the wind as we race toward 2008. (Steve Fraser is co-founder of the American Empire Project and Editor-at-Large of the journal New Labor Forum. He is the author of Every Man a Speculator, A History of Wall Street in American Life, and most recently co-editor of Ruling America: A History of Wealth and Power in a Democracy)

Sphere: Related Content

Home Remodeling Plans - Do Your Homework And Find Someone Trustworthy

Helen Yanulus
Pocono Life Writer

Americans spent an estimated $210 billion on residential remodeling in 2005, and the most popular areas to renovate are kitchens and baths.

Mike Gillenkirk, owner of Kitchen Tune-Up of Pocono Pines, said, "It's a huge industry. If you take your remodeling dollars and apply them anywhere in the home, the most cost-effective is in the kitchen and bath areas."

That's because the way people use their homes has changed.

"From a kitchen standpoint, it has evolved into a gathering area, the center of the home," Gillenkirk said. "They're entertaining there and want space that is inviting, comfortable and up-to-date."

Gillenkirk has found that the majority of decision makers in his clientele are women over age 45. He has asked them, and all his customers, why they want a change.

Usually the quality of what exists in the room isn't up to par, and they would like to change that. Sometimes, clients need more room and need to redesign the space to accommodate that need. Some simply want to change the look of the cabinets.

On average, Gillenkirk estimated that people spend between $20,000 and $50,000 to completely renovate their kitchen, particularly if the room needs to be redesigned. The cost is much less for refacing cabinets and other cosmetic changes without changing the design, which may be priced under $10,000.

So when investing in a home, Gillenkirk had a few helpful tips to get the homeowner through the process.

  • Examine the design. "Ask, 'Am I happy with the size of my kitchen? Can I live with the present design?' " Gillenkirk said. Changing the design can be costly but worth it in the end. This is truly a matter of budget.


  • What are your dreams? Do you want something dramatically different? Do you want to knock out a wall for more space? Even though some dreams may be costly, by deciding what is important to you will help you to come up with a list of must haves versus would like to have. "Make sure your voice is heard, and you get out all you want in your new kitchen," Gillenkirk said.


  • Are the cabinets in good shape? They may be in good condition, but you may be tired of the look. This might qualify for refacing, which is less costly than new or custom cabinets.


  • Decide on a budget. What can you spend? Where will you get the money? Savings, a home-equity loan and financing by contractors are some options. Also, be prepared for unforeseen circumstances, such as bad wiring or a rotting subfloor. Those may add to the cost of the job.


  • Find a good contractor. Seek out referrals from family and friends. "A referral from someone who has worked with the contractor is the best way to go," Gillenkirk said. Also, check references and get two or three bids. "Don't get hung up on the price. It's tempting to grab the lowest price supplier, but look at a variety of things, including the trust of the salesperson, the pictures of completed work, reputation," Gillenkirk said.


  • Find someone you trust. "Trust is so important. If no one is there, the work has to be done during the week. The homeowner must provide a key," Gillenkirk said.


  • Be prepared for a mess. "You have to break a few eggs to make an omelet. There will be a disturbance in the home. Ask the potential contractor, 'Do you clean up each night?'"


  • Don't be afraid. Gillenkirk said, "People should not be scared off by what they see in slick magazines and on HGTV. Kitchen makeovers can be a lot more affordable."

  • Sphere: Related Content

    Democrats bask in 2006 success, look toward 2008 at annual event


    Doug Wilson

    Herald-Whig Senior Writer

    Democrats are celebrating their recent election victories and trying to lay the groundwork for future gains during Democrat Days.

    "A lot of people turned Northeast Missouri a little bluer than it used to be on the red and blue dials," said Sen. Wes Shoemyer, D-Clarence.

    Democrat Days co-chairman John Yancey cited voter backlash against President Bush and the Republican majority, but noted there also might have been regional motivations.

    Others in attendance agreed.

    "I think there's been a real unhappiness with what's going on in Washington and in Jefferson City," said former Rep. Robert Clayton III. "And when they're unhappy, they come out looking for alternatives and at Democrat Days they're definitely going to get different alternatives."

    Rep. Rachel Bringer, D-Palmyra, said Northeast Missouri had more gains for Democrats than any other part of the state. Six of nine House seats are now held by Democrats and Shoemyer holds the Senate seat.

    Others believe Democrats made big gains in the region because of a new mindset and approach to governance.

    "We finally got organized and formed the Northeast Missouri Democrats. I believe if other areas would do this and do grassroots type things it would bring out more voters and the Democrat party would be stronger," said Mackey Johnston, a precinct committeeman from Newark.

    Rep. Tom Shively, D-Shelbyville, pointed out a group of young volunteers who helped him win Linn County during his campaign last fall against incumbent Rep. Kathy Chinn, R-Clarence.

    Shively wants to see more young people involved in politics. They may be motivated to get involved when they hear about the financial bills their generation may have to pay due to decisions by today's politicians.

    Rep. Paul Quinn, D-Monroe City, has been attending Democrat Days for years. He spent 22 years in Monroe County offices before winning his legislative seat last November. He thought his schedule was busy before, but Quinn now sees lots of days where his activities calendar is full for 12, 13 or more hours.

    Still, it's been an enjoyable experience so far and Quinn felt relaxed and at ease visiting with constituents gathered at the Hannibal Inn.

    Shoemyer said the annual Democrat gathering is a good way to hear from voters. It's also good for energizing the party faithful.

    Duane Burghard of Columbia was trying to energize the crowd in other ways. He took training from Al Gore so he could do slide presentations dealing with Gore's documentary "An Inconvenient Truth," which deals with global warming. Burghard was set to do two presentations during Democrat Days.

    Burghard unsuccessfully challenged U.S. Rep. Kenny Hulshof, R-Columbia, last fall. He said while talking with Hulshof after the final results were in, the incumbent told him that while Burghard had lost, many of the issues he espoused won nationwide.

    More than 700 people had registered for this year's event. That's up from many non-election years.

    Missouri Attorney General Jay Nixon, who is expected to challenge Gov. Matt Blunt next year, is expected to attend the banquet tonight. U.S. Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., also is expected to attend. U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., will be the keynote speaker.

    Contact Senior Writer Doug Wilson at dwilson@whig.com or (217) 221-3372

    Sphere: Related Content

    Hillary Clinton 44th US President - predicts Indian Numerologist


    Indian Numerologist predicts that Hillary Rodham Clinton would be the 44th President of the United States of America. According to the Indian Numerologist analysis, the next U.S. Presidential election is on November 4, 2008. On that day, numerologists predict that signs would remain favorable for her. Besides, the next election is to choose the 44th U.S. President (4 + 4 = 8), Hillary will be in her 62nd year (6 + 2 = 8), to be more precise, on that day pf the election, Hillary will be 61 years and 10 days old (6 + 1 + 1 + 0 = 8). Indian numerologists M.K. Damodaran confidentially predicts that numbers 4 and 8 being highly influential for Hillary Rodham Clinton and she will be elected as the 44th US President.

    It is seen that generally number 8 persons are influenced by number 4 also. So, this will be an additional luck for Hillary in the November 4, 2008 U.S. Presidential election.

    Amateur numerologists M.K. Damodaran of Kannur District, Kerala State, India, confidentially predicts that numbers 4 and 8 being highly influential for Hillary, and she will be elected as the 44th US President.

    Damodaran further writes, “It is seen that the year 2008 is very crucial for Hillary and Bill Clinton.

    Given below the analysis and prediction regarding Hillary Rodham Clinton’s prospects in the forthcoming US Presidential race/

    ”I am herewith submitting a detailed write-up regarding the chance of Hillary Rodham Clinton in the Nov. 4, 2008 U.S. Presidential election . I humbly request to examine this.

    Now that Hillary Rodham Clinton is hoping to be nominated as the candidate for the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election, it is immensely interesting to numerologically analyze her prospect.

    Now, let us examine the influence of numbers 4 and 8 in Hillary’s life.

    She was born on October 26, 1947. Her birth number is 8 (2 + 6 = 8) It is seen that number 8 has a strong influence on Hillary. To begin with, she was officially nominated to run for New York Senate seat on May 17, 2000 (1 + 7 = 8) After winning the election, she became a Member of the 107th Senate (1 + 0 + 7 = 8).

    The next U.S. Presidential election is on November 4, 2008. On that day, Hillary will be in her 62nd year (6 + 2 = 8). To be more precise, she will be 61 years and 10 days old (6 + 1 + 1 + 0 = 8). Besides, the next election is to choose the 44th U.S. President (4 + 4 = 8).

    It is seen that, generally number 8 persons are influenced by number 4 also. So, this will be an additional luck for Hillary in the November 4, 2008 U.S. Presidential election.

    In addition to that, it is submitted that her ‘name number’ (occult number) is 67 which adds up to 4.

    Name number is arrived at by adding together the value of each alphabet of the name. English alphabets are placed into 8 groups and each letter in a particular group assigned a particular value. This is discussed below.

    No. of groups Letters Value of each letter

    1) a, i, j, q, y - 1

    2) b, k, r - 2

    3) c, g, l, s - 3

    4) d, m, t - 4

    5) e, h, n, x - 5

    6) u, v, w - 6

    7) o, z - 7

    8) f, p - 8

    Now, let us find out the name number of Hillary Rodham Clinton.

    Hillary = H + i +l + l + a + r + y
    = 5 + 1 + 3 + 3 + 1 + 2 + 1 = 16

    Rodham = R + o + d + h + a + m
    = 2 + 7 + 4 + 5 + 1 + 4 = 23

    Clinton = C + l + i + n + t + o + n
    = 3 + 3 + 1 + 5 + 4 + 7 + 5 = 28

    Thus Hillary Rodham Clinton = 16 + 23 + 28
    = 67 (6 + 7 = 13 Further adding, 1 + 3 = 4)

    While discussing the influence of numbers on Hillary, it is quite interesting to note the influence of number 1 on Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton was born on August 19, 1946. His birth number is 1 (1 + 9 = 10, 1 + 0 = 1). Further, his name number is 37 which adds up to 1 (3 + 7 = 10, 1 + 0 = 1). So, Bill Clinton is literally ‘numero uno’. Now, see the strong influence of number 1 on Bill Clinton.

    1) He was elected U.S. President at the age of 46 which adds up to 1 (4 + 6 = 10, 1 + 0 = 1)

    2) On May 28, 1997 the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that “Paula Jones sexual discrimination suit against Clinton can proceed while he is in office” (2 + 8 = 10, 1 + 0 = 1).

    3) On January 10, 1998 Clinton deposed in the Paula Jones case (1 + 0 = 1).

    4) Kenneth Starr submitted his enquiry report in Monica Lewinsky case on September 10, 1998 (1 + 0 = 1)

    5) Papers in Paula Jones case released on October 19, 1998 (1+9 = 10, 1 + 0 = 1)

    6) Congressional hearing on impeachment began on November 19, 1998.

    7) There were 37 members in the House Judiciary Committee (3 + 7 = 10, 1 + 0=1)

    8) ‘One’ member belonging to the Republican Party voted along with Democrats.

    9) The Senate voted on October 28, 1998 on an impeachment trial plan that called Monica Lewinsky to testify (2 + 8 = 10, 1 + 0 = 1).

    10) The House of Representatives voted to impeach Clinton on December 19, 1998 (1 + 9 = 10, 1 + 0 = 1)

    11) Questioning of Monica Lewinsky started on February 1, 1999.

    12) Clinton was acquitted on impeachment charges only because 10 Republicans cross-voted in his favour ( 1 + 0 = 1).

    13) Clinton was the first President to visit Gaza Strip.

    The year 2008 adds up to 1 (2 + 0 + 0 + 8 = 10, 1 + 0 = 1). So, the year is
    very crucial to Bill Clinton.

    Hence, it is seen that the year 2008 is very crucial for Hillary and Bill Clinton.

    So, coming back to Hillary, numbers 4 and 8 being highly influential for Hillary, she will be elected 44th U.S. President in the election to be held on November 4, 2008, on which day Hillary will be 61 years and 10 days old (6 + 1 + 1 + 0 = 8).

    M.K. Damodaran writes in conclusion, “As an amateur numerologist passionately researching in numerology for the last 18 years, my findings/predictions have been widely published (The Indian Express, The Hindu, The Times of India and The Asian Tribune etc.). The following internationally interesting findings/predictions made by me were reported.

    1) Accident death of Princess Diana.

    2) Violent death of former Afghan President Dr. Najibullah.

    3) Bill Clinton influenced by number 1.

    4) That number 13 was lucky for Vajpayee and that he would return as Prime Minister after the election in 1999.

    5) Electoral victory of George W. Bush in the November 7, 2000 U.S. Presidential election.

    6) That Bush will lose out to Saddam and that the former will be the ultimate loser in the Iraq affair.

    (However, the prediction that Bush will not come to power for the second time was proved incorrect)

    Sphere: Related Content

    Real Conservatives Cannot Afford To Sit This One Out.


    Ann C. Mulkern
    Denver Post Staff Writer

    The next president must possess core conservative principles or risk losing the election and much of what America stands for, Rep. Tom Tancredo told a cheering crowd today at a conservative convention.

    The Littleton Republican who is considering a presidential run presented his political vision in a speech to the Conservative Political Action Conference.

    In a packed and cheering ballroom, Tancredo said it's imperative to crack down on illegal immigration and reject "the cult of multi-culturalism" that he says is destroying American values. Tancredo also declared the need to return to traditional conservative ideals, including opposition to legalized abortion.

    "With the world at war, and the very survival of Western Civilization at risk, with the Supreme Court potentially one death or retirement away from reversing Roe Vs. Wade," Tancredo said, referencing the case that legalized abortion, "real conservatives cannot afford to sit this one out."

    Tancredo was one of several potential and declared presidential candidates appearing at the conference, an annual Washington D.C. gathering of the right wing of the Republican Party. In presidential election season, it serves as an audition for candidates wanting to capture conservative activists and impress the national media with their ability to draw crowds.

    Tancredo has formed a presidential exploratory committee, saying he sees the need for a true conservative in the race. He touted his conservative credentials and used three Biblical references during his speech.

    Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., and Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., also spoke.

    Conservative Political Action Conference members will take a straw poll Saturday indicating which candidates they most support.

    Walking on to the stage to the strains of the theme from the movie "Rocky," Tancredo said he's a "huge long shot" and compared himself to the hero of the Oscar-winning boxing movie.

    Tancredo alternately spoke about his potential to win the presidency, saying he knows it's David vs. Goliath, but that "David won." But he also seemed to concede he won't advance when he said he wants "a candidate in this presidential election that I can vote for."

    "I'm so tired of voting because the person is the lesser of two evils," Tancredo said. "I want to be able to vote for somebody &I believe is leading a crusade, somebody who I actually want to participate in that crusade because they inspire me to do so.

    "I may not be that person, I understand," Tancredo said. "But look for that in whoever it is you're going to support."

    Some Tancredo supporters at the event said they believe he can win the nomination, despite the fact that lead candidates are raising an estimated million dollars a week. Tancredo's congressional bank account had $189,000 when he made the last required disclosure at the end of 2006.

    "I absolutely think he can get elected," said Nathan Rager, 21, of Virginia. "He's the most well-known conservative in this race."

    According to Rager, Former New York Mayor Rudy Guiliani has a liberal record. Romney's record on conservative issues isn't consistent, he said. Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., "is just an amnesty supporter," he said, referring to McCain's support of a legal status for illegal immigrants.

    Republican K.C. McAlpin of Virginia didn't vote for President Bush in either 2000 or 2004, choosing instead an independent candidate. He wouldn't say whom. He said he'll do so again rather than vote for McCain, Romney or Guiliani.

    Tancredo, McAlpin said "is an authentic conservative."

    Romney supporter Ruth Malhotra, 23, of Georgia, however, said while Tancredo's done a "amazing work" on the immigration issue, he's "not presidential material.

    "When you're looking at someone to lead our country, you need a strong record of leadership, more broadly defined," Malhotra said. "I don't think Tom Tancredo is the best person to lead our country."

    During his speech, Tancredo demonstrated his fondness for controversy. He repeated his tempest-provoking remark made last year that Miami is like a Third World Country. He talked about the letter he received from then-Florida Gov. Jeb Bush. In that letter, Bush said Florida people celebrated diversity.

    "I'm all for celebrating diversity," Tancredo told the crowd. "When you make a state religion out of it, that's when you have a problem."

    He said that the country needs a leader who knows we need a strong national defense "because our enemies are psychopaths and our allies are the French."

    When comparing himself to the fictional Rocky character, Tancredo joked that one of the differences between himself and Sylvester Stallone was that "probably Sylvester Stallone does not smoke cigars. But I do."

    The crowd erupted in large cheers and hoots. Last month, a Capitol police officer came to Tancredo's congressional office after a neighbor smelled smoke and called police. Tancredo was smoking a cigar, which is legal in lawmakers' offices.

    "Although we are in the middle of a place that's run by what I refer to as the lifestyle Nazis here in Washington D.C., that don't let you do things like smoke in public places, in my office in the capitol anyway, the smoking lap is lit, even if my next door neighbor doesn't like it."

    Sphere: Related Content

    At Last Supermodel Naomi Campbell Confesses To Cocaine Addiction.


    Supermodel Naomi Campbell has spoken about her battle with cocaine addiction. Campbell said she was first offered the drug at 24.

    Five years later she ended up in rehab and now attends daily Narcotics Anonymous meetings wherever she is in the world in a bid to stay clean.

    "I was at a concert in a European country and I was offered cocaine," she told GQ magazine as she recounted her introduction to the drug.

    "It made me feel invincible. Like I could conquer the world. I was just completely over-confident, but it's all a misconception because when you wake up the next day it's all gone and you feel awful. And the more you take drugs, the more you want. And that's how you become an addict."

    But Campbell, 36, was defiant when told her drug-taking was against the law.

    "Yes, so go get the drug-dealers, not the takers. Drug-taking has been going on for centuries and everybody does it," she said.

    The star, who was born in Streatham, south London, also spoke frankly about Kate Moss's drug problems. Moss was pictured in a newspaper in 2005 allegedly chopping out lines of cocaine.

    The pair are close friends and Campbell said: "She is hurting herself and when it's exposed she doesn't have the space or time to help herself because everyone is looking at her. It's hard."

    Campbell is pictured in an accompanying GQ photoshoot which sends up her bad girl reputation. It includes a shot of her lying naked in a bath while two police officers look on. Another picture sees her pointing a gun at the camera.

    Elsewhere in the interview with former Daily Mirror editor Piers Morgan, Campbell weighed into the size zero debate and said the decision by Spanish fashion bosses to ban skinny models from the catwalk was "ridiculous".

    "I see girls walking down the street or working in Selfridges who are 10 times skinnier. Nobody attacks them," she said.

    During a separate interview in the US, Campbell said she regretted attacking her maid with a mobile phone.

    She pleaded guilty to misdemeanour assault last month for hitting Ana Scolavino in the back of the head with the phone last March in a row over a missing pair of jeans.

    A judge ordered her to undertake five days of community service and to attend a two-day anger management course.

    "I felt very remorseful for having thrown the phone at someone that didn't deserve it," Campbell told US TV show Extra.

    "I have a deep sense of shame for the things I've done."

    The model blamed the attack on "tiredness, lack of sleep (and) just so many things".

    Sphere: Related Content

    Brighton High School - Faced A Year Of Tragedy


    Julia Lyon
    The Salt Lake Tribune

    The death of sweet, smiling Kirsten Hinckley at Trolley Square was a public tragedy that everyone felt a part of.
    But inside the walls of Brighton High School, where the school flag flew at half-staff last week, the students could now painfully count up to four. Four times they have learned a friend or classmate has been taken away, some in freak accidents, the last in a hail of gunfire.
    This is something the Brighton family has experienced alone.
    It's not that every kid knew every student who died - this is a big high school, after all - but they all felt the ripple of grief that has made for a strange year.
    "As bad as it [has been], it [has] opened our eyes," said Spencer Esplin, a Brighton senior. "There are things you don't realize until it actually happens. Death is one of them."
    With each loss, students became better prepared to deal with the next, more able to understand how classmates felt when they lost a best friend. They were connected by the school's quartet of tragedies, as the city has been linked since Trolley Square.
    "We all went to school with Kirsten even if we didn't know her personally," said Stefanie Hall- mark, a junior.
    Jim Hodges, a Brighton High social studies teacher, said losing a peer - or several - means students learn a lesson that's a true cliche: On
    Advertisement

    life's short route, you lose people you love.
    That's even the case for teachers who see current or former students' lives cut short.
    James Henrie, a Brighton junior who Hodges described as "one of my beloved students," fell to his death during a hike in Big Cottonwood Canyon last June. Two other students also died in the past year: Ryan Stewart after an ATV accident and Savannah Staley at home.
    When someone dies, sometimes people feel powerless, he said. By giving back as students at Brighton have through fundraisers for the Hinckley family, they can take back a little bit of control - even if they can't change what happened.
    "I think it's a sense of doing something positive out of a tragedy," he said.
    Guiding students through fundraisers for Kirsten's family is Jan Moncur, a Brighton teacher who knows first-hand what loss means. Her son died in 2005 while training to return to Iraq. The tragedy came two years after Nathan Dalley, Brighton's 1994 senior class president, died serving in Iraq.
    Losing her own child opened Moncur's eyes to the possibility of losing a Brighton student, too.
    "Until you lose a child you will never understand the pain, you will never understand the heartache, the loneliness, the want for one more hug, one more phone call," she said. "So I find myself looking at kids differently, thinking it may be my last time I see you."
    Whether the mourning ever ends is debatable. For some, it will last a lifetime. But homework, tests and prom will keep coming.
    Milestones such as graduation will make the kids remember: She or he would have been here.
    No death can be entirely forgotten.
    Through student donations and competitions for prizes, the school raised about $6,000 in three days last week that will be given to the Hinckley family. The classes that donated the most money won a chick-flick movie and tubs of ice cream with chocolate syrup, something Kirsten's friends say she would have loved.
    This week the students will tie a quilt to give to Kirsten's mother, Carolyn Tuft, who remains in the hospital recovering from gunshot wounds.
    Two sophomore boys wrote a song in memory of Kirsten that they will sell on a CD to raise money for the Hinckley family.
    Students' regret is that they didn't do more to acknowledge the deaths of their other classmates until Trolley Square's shocking violence spurred them to action. They want to honor future deaths differently, now that the students have learned how to help and how to heal.
    "This is the event that made us realize what we need to do," said Matt Balk, a junior.

    Sphere: Related Content

    Train Tragedy Families Go To Court


    Grieving families of those who died in the Ufton Nervet rail crash will launch a High Court bid today for the legal aid they need to be represented at the inquest into the tragedy.

    Seven people were killed in the November 2004 crash after Brian Drysdale, 48, of Radstock Road, Newtown, left his car on a level crossing.


    The eight-carriage train, carrying about 180 passengers, ploughed into his car at high speed, resulting in Mr Drysdale’s death, that of the train’s driver, Stanley Martin, 54, from Torquay, and five of the train’s passengers.


    The inquest, which was due to be held in October 2005, was adjourned pending the outcome of the High Court case.


    The families of those who died were refused legal aid to be legally represented at the inquest and their lawyers will challenge that decision at London’s High Court today before top judge, Mr Justice Owen.


    Berkshire coroner Peter Bedford said at the time of the inquest’s adjournment he decided to give the two families, the Main and Webster families – who were denied legal aid for their solicitors more time to launch their judicial review bid.


    The families lost three relatives between them. David Main, of Speen, near Newbury, lost his partner Anjanette Rossi, 38, who worked for West Berkshire Council, and his nine-year-old daughter Louella in the disaster.


    The Webster family, from Moretonhampstead, Devon, lost their daughter Emily, aged 14.


    Emily Webster’s father, Peter Webster, described the refusal of legal aid as “outrageous” and “an absolute disgrace”.


    The other victims of the crash were Barry Strevens, 55, from Wells, Somerset and Royals fan Charlie Matthews, 72, from Warminster.


    During the tragedy, the front train wheels derailed immediately but the train stayed upright. However, when the train passed over a set of points further down the line every carriage came off the tracks.


    The front of the First Great Western train ploughed into the embankment, while the rear power car on the train continued to propel the train forward, according to a Health and Safety Executive report on the tragedy.


    Source: getreading.co.uk

    Tags: eight-carriage | Ufton | Torquay | Radstock | Nervet | TRAGEDY | resulting | represented | refused | ploughed | pending | passengers | outcome | Lawyers | launch | KILLED | judge | Inquest | driver | died | decision | daughter | crash | continues | challenge | carrying | adjourned | webster | stanley | peter | October | november | Newtown | martin | London | justice | Emergencies | drysdale | court | brian | BEDFORD

    Sphere: Related Content

    Argentina frees man sought in India arms scandal

    Ottavio Quattrocchi, the Italian businessman being held in Argentina and wanted for questioning in India in a high-profile arms scandal, has been released from custody, a federal judge said on Monday.

    Federal Judge Mariana Arjol said an appeals court in Misiones province ordered the conditional release of Quattrocchi after he was detained by Argentine authorities on Feb. 6 at an airport in the northern city of Puerto Iguazu.

    It was not immediately clear when he was freed but Arjol said her court had rejected the request for release.

    "They appealed and the (appeals) court granted it," she said.

    Indian authorities accuse Quattrocchi of taking $7 million in bribes as a middleman in the $1.2 billion purchase of artillery from Swedish arms maker Bofors AB in 1986 for the Indian army.

    Quattrocchi has denied any wrongdoing and left India in the early 1990s. He has since lived in Malaysia and Europe.

    Argentine authorities say Quattrocchi appeared to be traveling en route to the Argentine capital, Buenos Aires.

    He is believed to have been a friend of Sonia Gandhi, the powerful, Italian-born chief of the ruling Congress Party.

    The arms scandal seriously dented the reputation of her late husband, then-Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, and contributed to the fall of his government in elections in 1989.

    A Delhi court exonerated Gandhi of wrongdoing in 2004, 13 years after he was assassinated by a suspected Sri Lankan Tamil Tiger suicide bomber.

    Other key figures in the Bofors case also have died and the company has since changed its name.

    Sphere: Related Content

    To Push Death Penalty Or Not



    TINA A. BROWN,
    Courant Staff Writer

    Five of the state's top prosecutors - who usually ask the questions in court - were forced to answer them on the witness stand Friday as defense lawyers for a convicted murderer mounted a challenge to the constitutionality of the state's death penalty.

    Compelled to testify by the state Supreme Court, the prosecutors appeared in Superior Court in Hartford to answer questions about how they decide whether to seek the death penalty. Seven more top prosecutors are scheduled to testify next month.

    Lawyers for Jesse Campbell III, who faces a possible death sentence for murdering two Hartford women, claim Connecticut's death-penalty law is unconstitutional because prosecutors act in an "arbitrary and capricious" manner when considering capital punishment.

    Chief State's Attorney Kevin Kane and state's attorneys from four judicial districts all said they rely on the death penalty law - which spells out crimes for which the death penalty can be sought and factors that must be considered - plus the code of prosecutors' ethics.

    Questioned by Ronald Gold, one of Campbell's lawyers, all five said their offices had no written standards or guidelines.

    Campbell was convicted by a Superior Court jury in Hartford in 2004 of capital felony, murder and other charges in the killings of LaTaysha Logan and Desiree Privette and the wounding of Privette's aunt, Carolyn Privette, in Hartford.

    Capital felony carries only two penalties - death or life in prison. The jury deadlocked when considering whether Campbell should be executed, and Judge Edward J. Mullarkey declared a mistrial in the penalty phase. A new jury will decide Campbell's penalty.

    The only state's attorney not subpoenaed to testify was Hartford's James Thomas, whose office is prosecuting Campbell.

    Friday's highly unusual proceeding attracted a crowd of spectators, including lawyers, assistant state's attorneys, clerks, interns and at least one judge. The prosecutors had tried to quash defense lawyers' subpoenas, but state Supreme Court Justice Joette Katz rejected their motion in August, forcing them to testify in Mullarkey's courtroom.

    Kane, the state's top law enforcement officer, testified first, followed by state's attorneys from the Windham, Middlesex, New Britain and Ansonia/Milford judicial districts.

    Kane gave the most detailed answers. He said in his current position, as supervisor of all state's attorneys in Connecticut, and during his more than a decade as New London state's attorney, he used an "operating assumption" that if assistants in his office planned to charge a defendant with capital felony, they would discuss the matter with him first.

    "Because of the nature of the case, I expect the assistants to talk to me. I expect assistants to have common sense in cases that would have a significant relevance or impact," Kane said.

    Gold's question about the thought process that Kane uses when deciding not to seek the death penalty drew objections from the assistant state's attorneys prosecuting Campbell, Vicki Melchiorre and Dennis O'Connor. They claimed the question violated Kane's "prosecutorial discretion," and Mullarkey agreed.

    While Kane was sometimes jovial, Windham County State's Attorney Patricia Froehlich was often lawyerly, but clearly realized her role had been reversed.

    "I'm accustomed to being on the other side," she said at one point.

    "I know I can't object," she said later. "I can't answer it that way."

    Ansonia/Milford State's Attorney Kevin Lawlor was the only witness who said he had received extensive training on how to weigh capital punishment.

    Middlesex State's Attorney Timothy J. Liston said several factors were critical. "You better have the facts and the law behind you before you can charge," he said. He added that since he took his job five years ago, "we haven't had a case that met all the criteria."

    New Britain State's Attorney Scott J. Murphy said he went by the book the one time he charged a defendant with capital felony. That book was the state law.

    All of the prosecutors said they were aware that a panel of senior state's attorneys was created to advise their less experienced colleagues when they had questions about charging a defendant with capital felony. But none of the five said they had used that process.

    The hearing is scheduled to resume March 23.

    Sphere: Related Content

    Hotel in Wallingford Robbed



    News Channel 8

    Police in Wallingford are investigating an armed robbery at a hotel.

    It happened at the Courtyard Marriott on Northrop Road around 2:00 AM.

    Police say a man went into the hotel, took out a gun, and demanded money from a night auditor.

    The robber did take some cash from the registers.

    Police say the man is black and about 20 to 25 years old, with short hair.

    At the time of the robbery, he had on a black fleece, dark jeans, and white sneakers.

    Nobody was hurt. Anybody with information is asked to call Police at (203) 294-2849.

    Sphere: Related Content